A97377:107
A most necessary & fruitful dialogue, between [the] seditious libertine or rebel Anabaptist, &…A most necessary & frutefull dialogue, betwene [the] seditious libertin or rebel Anabaptist, &…
A most necessary & fruitful dialogue, between [the] seditious libertine or rebel Anabaptist, & the true obedient christia[n] wherein, as in a mirror or glass ye shall see [the] excellence and worthiness of a christia[n] magistrate: & again what obedience is due unto public rulers of all th[os]e [that] profess Christ yea, though [the] rulers, in extern & outward things, to their utter damnation, do otherwise then well: translated out of Latin into English, by Iho[n] Veron Senonoys.A most necessary & frutefull dialogue, betwene [the] seditious libertin or rebel Anabaptist, & the true obedient christia[n] wherin, as in a mirrour or glasse ye shal se [the] excellencte and worthynesse of a christia[n] magistrate: & again what obedience is due vnto publique rulers of all th[os]e [that] professe Christ yea, though [the] rulers, in externe & outward thinges, to their vtter dampnatyon, do otherwyse then well: translated out of Latyn into Englishe, by Iho[n] Veron Senonoys.
Worcester : Imprinted the third day of April. Anno. Do. 1551. At Worcester in the high street, by John Oswen. They be also to sell at Shrewesbury. Cum priuligio ad imprimendum solum, 1551Worcester : Imprynted the third daye of Aprill. Anno. Do. 1551. At Worceter in ye hygh strete, by Ihon Oswen. They be also to sell at Shrewesbury. Cum priuligio ad imprimendum solum, 1551
Dialogue 4: The fourth Dialogue. ¶ Whether it be lawful to resist ye magistrate, where we do write…
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
JOI. Why, doest thou not read, that, which followeth:1 And the king did not grant the people their petition, because that god hath forsaken him, that he might, or should perform his word, that he had spoken in the hands of Achias the Silonite, to Jeroboam, the son of Nabate. Thou canst not prove by this, that it is lawful for any man to make insurrection of his own head, against tyrants, or evil rulers
IOI. Why, doest thou not reade, that, whiche foloweth:1 And the kinge did not graunt the people their petytyon, because yt god hath forsaken hym, yt he might, or should perfourme hys word, that he had spoken in the handes of Achias the Silonite, to Hieroboam, the sonne of Nabate. Thou canst not proue by this, that it is lawfull for any man to make insurrection of hys own head, agaynst tyrants, or euil rulers
- 1Why Goboam did not grant ye petition of the people, wherefore he was utterly forsaken of ten tribes.Why Goboam dyd not graunt ye petityon of ye people, wherfore he was vtterly forsaken of ten trybes.
SIM. I fear, least this doctrine will ⟨image 54⟩make men sluggish, negligent, & dastards that if at any time, the lord doth send a deliverer, they will be in doubt, of the will of the lord.
SIM. I feare, least thys doctrine wyll ⟨image 54⟩make men sluggish, negligent, & dastards that if at any time, the lorde doth sende a deliuerer, they wyl be in doubt, of the wil of the lord.