N00406:79
The principles of the Protestant religion maintained, and churches of New-England, in the profession…
The principles of the Protestant religion maintained, and churches of New-England, in the profession and exercise thereof defended, against all the calumnies of one George Keith, a Quaker, in a book lately published at Pennsylvania [sic], to undermine them both. / By the minsters of the Gospel in Boston, ; [Nine lines of Scripture texts]The principles of the Protestant religion maintained, and churches of New-England, in the profession and exercise thereof defended, against all the calumnies of one George Keith, a Quaker, in a book lately published at Pensilvania [sic], to undermine them both. / By the minsters of the Gospel in Boston, ; [Nine lines of Scripture texts]
printed by Richard Pierce, 1690
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
When he saith (p, 19.) to be taught of God, &c. as the Prophets & Apostles, what is it but to be taught by Divine inward Revelation? It it is a mere Sophism. We consider ⟨p. 31⟩the Prophets and Apostles, either as such extraordinary Officers, or as they were Believers, for they had this double Capacity: to say that all were or are taught as they were, in the former sense is utterly false, as has bin proved; to acknowledge them so in the latter sense, proves not such Revelations; yea, Paul himself, was not always inspired, but sometimes gave his Judgment as one illuminated. 1. Cor. 7. 40. Nor can he prove, that 1. Cor. 2. 10. is applicable to all Believers in the same sense; the Revelation or Inspiration belonged to the Apostles, the Application, or discovery by Illumination belonged to all believers in their measures: how ungroundedly therefore does he here assert, that Paul holds forth that his Illumination was Revelation? must he not so contradict himself in 1. Cor. 12. 29, 30.?
When he saith (p, 19.) to be taught of God, &c. as the Prophets & Apostles, what is it but to be taught by Divine inward Revelation? It it is a meer Sophism. We consider ⟨p. 31⟩the Prophets and Apostles, either as such extraordinary Officers, or as they were Believers, for they had this double Capacity: to say that all were or are taught as they were, in the former sense is utterly false, as has bin proved; to acknowledge them so in the latter sense, proves not such Revelations; yea, Paul himself, was not alwaies inspired, but sometimes gave his Judgment as one illuminated. 1. Cor. 7. 40. Nor can he prove, that 1. Cor. 2. 10. is applicable to all Believers in the same sense; the Revelation or Inspiration belonged to the Apostles, the Application, or discovery by Illumination belonged to all believers in their measures: how ungroundedly therefore does he here assert, that Paul holds forth that his Illumination was Revelation? must he not so contradict himself in