N03404:83
A letter to the author of the pamphlet called An answer [sic] to the…A letter to the author of the pamphlet called An answeer [sic] to the…
A letter to the author of the pamphlet called An answer [sic] to the Hampshire narrative. : [Three lines from Proverbs]A letter to the author of the pamphlet called An answeer [sic] to the Hampshire narrative. : [Three lines from Proverbs]
Boston: : s.n., Printed in the year 1737
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Hence also it is evident, tho' you do so load us with Reproach about this Matter, charging us, Page 35, with Fallacy that tends to impose on the World, and with a double Abuse and Misrepresentation, Page 48, and with setting this Matter in a wrong Light on purpose, and therein treating Mr. Cooper in a very disingenuous and injurious Manner; that yet our Charge is just, and our Witness demonstratively true in this Matter, and that Mr. Cooper did indeed, before he was sent to, lay out himself to be a Judge in this Case; and that you yourself have mistaken Mr. Cooper's Proposal, and if you understood it in the Time of it, must needs have forgotten and be strangely lost and confounded in your: Thoughts about it since. Hence also 'tis evident that the Rev. Mr. Williams of Hatfield, in his Answer to Mr. Cooper's Letter, nor his Amanuensis, did not mistake his Proposal.
Hence also it is evident, tho' you do so load us with Reproach about this Matter, charging us, Page 35, with Fallacy that tends to impose on the World, and with a double Abuse and Misrepresentation, Page 48, and with setting this Matter in a wrong Light on purpose, and therein treating Mr. Cooper in a very disingenious and injurious Manner; that yet our Charge is just, and our Witness demonstratively true in this Matter, and that Mr. Cooper did indeed, before he was sent to, lay out himself to be a Judge in this Case; and that you yourself have mistaken Mr. Cooper's Proposal, and if you understood it in the Time of it, must needs have forgotten and be strangely lost and confounded in your: Thoughts about it since. Hence also 'tis evident that the Rev. Mr. Williams of Hatfield, in his Answer to Mr. Cooper's Letter, nor his Amanuensis, did not mistake his Proposal.
And what, Rev. Sir, can be your Design in suggesting that Mr. W—ms of Hatfield ignorantly signed to a Letter drawn up by some Body else, and so that the Mistake that it went upon was none of his, tho' he signed it; but the Mistake of his Amanuensis; and telling that the Body of the Letter is written by another Hand, and only signed with his own, and superscribed by Mr. Williams of Long-Meadow, unless it be to insinuate that the Letter was none of his, and that other People that got about him dealt with him as a Child, and drew up a Letter, out of their own Heads, and persuaded him to subscribe it, that it might be honoured with his Name, without his knowing what it was? And is this your rising up before the hoary Head, as you profess to do in your Letter to the same reverend and aged Gentleman, Page 56? Mr. Williams of Hatfield wrote that Letter with his own Hand, before ever Mr. Williams of Long-Meadow saw Mr. Cooper's Letter to him, and got it transcribed, it being very difficult to rd his Writing; the Letter lay by him waiting for an Opportunity to be sent; Mr. Williams of Long-Meadow informed him that there would