N05401:71
Misrepresentations corrected, and truth vindicated. In a reply to the Rev. Mr. Solomon Williams's…
Misrepresentations corrected, and truth vindicated. In a reply to the Rev. Mr. Solomon Williams's book, entitled, The true state of the question concerning the qualifications necessary to lawful communion in the Christian sacraments. / By Jonathan Edwards, M.A. Minister of the Gospel at Stockbridge. ; [Five lines of Scripture texts]Misrepresentations corrected, and truth vindicated. In a reply to the Rev. Mr. Solomon Williams's book, intitled, The true state of the question concerning the qualifications necessary to lawful communion in the Christian sacraments. / By Jonathan Edwards, M.A. Minister of the Gospel at Stockbridge. ; [Five lines of Scripture texts]
Boston: printed by S. Kneeland, 1752
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
8. Hence, in vain is all he says in Opposition to my eighth Argument, taken from the Manner of the Apostles treating and addressing the primitive Churches in their Epistles; since he does either expressly or virtually grant each of those three Things, which he himself reckons up as the Sum of what I intend under that Argument, viz. (1.) That the Apostles speak to the Churches, and of them, as supposing and judging them to be gracious Persons. (2.) That the Members of these Churches had such an Opinion of Themselves. (3.) That they had this Judgment one of another. Mr. W. allows all these. He abundantly allows and asserts, that the Members of Churches are such as […] supposed & judged, and rationally judged, to be gracious Persons, by those that admit them; that they are taken in under that Notion, and from Respect to such a Character appearing on them; and that they are rationally judged to be so by their Fellow-Christians; and that they must look at such a Character in themselves, and must make such a Pretence.
8. Hence, in vain is all he says in Opposition to my eighth Argument, taken from the Manner of the Apostles treating and addressing the primitive Churches in their Epistles; since he does either expresly or virtually grant each of those three Things, which he himself reckons up as the Sum of what I intend under that Argument, viz. (1.) That the Apostles speak to the Churches, and of them, as supposing and judging them to be gracious Persons. (2.) That the Members of these Churches had such an Opinion of Themselves. (3.) That they had this Judgment one of another. Mr. W. allows all these. He abundantly allows and asserts, that the Members of Churches are such as 〈…〉 supposed & judged, and rationally judged, to be gracious Persons, by those that admit them; that they are taken in under that Notion, and from Respect to such a Character appearing on them; and that they are rationally judged to be so by their Fellow-Christians; and that they must look at such a Character in themselves, and must make such a Pretence.
9. Since Mr. W. abundantly allows, that visible Christians, must be believed in Charity to be truly pious; and that they are such as have the moral Image of Christ appearing in