N06399:722
The great Christian doctrine of original sin defended
The great Christian doctrine of original sin defended; evidences of it's [sic] truth produced, and arguments to the contrary answered. Containing, in particular, a reply to the objections and arguings of Dr. John Taylor, in his book, entitled, "The Scripture-doctrine of original sin proposed to free and candid examination, &c. / By the late Reverend and learned Jonathan Edwards, president of the College of New-Jersey. ; [Thirteen lines of quotations]The great Christian doctrine of original sin defended; evidences of it's [sic] truth produced, and arguments to the contrary answered. Containing, in particular, a reply to the objections and arguings of Dr. John Taylor, in his book, intitled, "The Scripture-doctrine of original sin proposed to free and candid examination, &c. / By the late Reverend and learned Jonathan Edwards, president of the College of New-Jersey. ; [Thirteen lines of quotations]
printed by S. Kneeland, 1758
The great Christian Doctrine of ORIGINAL SIN defended. › Part 4 › Chapter 4
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2. 'Tis no more an Evidence of Adam's Posterity's being not included in the Threatening, denounced for his eating the forbidden Fruit, That they still have the temporal Blessings of Fruitfulness and a Dominion over the Creatures continued to them, than it is an Evidence of Adam's being not included in that Threatening himself, That he had these Blessings continued to him, was fruitful, and had Dominion over the Creatures after his Fall, equally with his Posterity.
2. 'Tis no more an Evidence of Adam's Posterity's being not included in the Threatning, denounced for his eating the forbidden Fruit, That they still have the temporal Blessings of Fruitfulness and a Dominion over the Creatures continued to them, than it is an Evidence of Adam's being not included in that Threatning himself, That he had these Blessings continued to him, was fruitful, and had Dominion over the Creatures after his Fall, equally with his Posterity.
3. There is good Evidence, that there were Blessings implied in the Benedictions God pronounced on Noah and his Posterity, which were granted on a new Foundation: on the Foot of a Dispensation diverse from any Grant, Promise, or Revelation, which God gave to Adam, antecedently to his Fall; even on the Foundation of the Covenant of Grace, established in Christ Jesus; a Dispensation, the Design of which is to deliver Men from the Curse, that came upon them by Adam's Sin, and to bring them to greater Blessings than over he had. These Blessings were pronounced on Noah and his Seed, on the same Foundation, whereon afterwards the Blessing was pronounced on Abraham and his Seed, which included both spiritual and temporal Benefits.—Noah had his Name prophetically given him by his Father Lamech, because by him and his Seed Deliverance should be obtained from the Curse, which came by Adam's Fall. Gen. v.29. And he called his Name Noah (i. e. REST,) saying, This ⟨p. 358⟩same shall comfort us concerning our Work, and Toil of our Hands, because of the Ground which the Lord hath cursed. Pursuant to the Scope and Intent of this Prophecy (which indeed seems to respect the same Thing with the Prophecy in