N20568:5418
The new and complete book of martyrs; or, An universal history of martyrdom: being Fox's Book of martyrs, revised and corrected, with additions and great improvements. : Containing an authentic account of the lives, persecutions and sufferings of the holy martyrs; and the many dreadful persecutions against the Church of Christ in all parts of the world, by pagans, Jews, Turks, papists, and others, from earliest ages of the church to the present period. ... The whole forming at once a general Christian martyrology, and a complete history of persecutions. / By the Rev. Mr. John Fox, M.A. late of Magdalen College, Oxford. ; Now revised, corrected and improved, with many additional articles, relating to the acts and monuments of the church. By Paul Wright, D.D. ; Embellished with forty elegant copper plate engravings. ; In two volumes. Vol. I[-II].The new and complete book of martyrs; or, An universal history of martyrdom: being Fox's Book of marytrs, revised and corrected, with additions and great improvements. : Containing an authentic account of the lives, persecutions and sufferings of the holy martyrs; and the many dreadful persecutions against the Church of Christ in all parts of the world, by pagans, Jews, Turks, papists, and others, from earliest ages of the church to the present period. ... The whole forming at once a general Christian martyrology, and a complete history of persecutions. / By the Rev. Mr. John Fox, M.A. late of Magdalen College, Oxford. ; Now revised, corrected and improved, with many additional articles, relating to the acts and monuments of the church. By Paul Wright, D.D. ; Embellished with forty elegant copper plate engravings. ; In two volumes. Vol. I[-II].
New-York: printed by William Durell, 1794
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3. and 4. To the 3d and 4th he says, That whereas he had granted to George Constantine the office of a register, who brought unto him a commission for the chancellorship, to be sealed and delivered to the aforesaid chanter of St. David's, desiring the said bishop to seal it, he utterly refused so to do, because the said George had put therein a clause of admitting clerks into benefices: which authority the said bishop would not in any wise grant, reserving the examination and admission of clerks only to himself, for the avoiding of wicked bribery and partiality. Whereupon the said George and the chanter promised the said bishop by their faith and truth, before three or four honest witnesses, not to execute that clause of institution into benefices, but only to those clerks whom the bishop did first examine and admit, and send unto them to be instituted and inducted; upon which promise the bishop sealed the said commission, and after that time the parsonage of Haskard being void, and by reason of lapse devolved to the bishop's gift for that time, he conferred it on one Henry Goddard, with a collation of institution by the king's authority, not extolling any foreign usurped authority. In which collation or institution is fully mentioned the renunciation of the bishop of Rome, and all foreign power and authority, with the full stile ⟨p. 518⟩of his majesty's supremacy. And this collation of the church of Huskard he gave, before he understood or knew that his chancellor had given out the like, and he surely thinketh his collation was the first. That notwithstanding, the said George Constantine, and the said chanter having a vowson determined by reason of lapse, admitted and instituted one John Gough, to the said parsonage of Haskard, by virtue of their expired vowson, and sealed his institution with a wrong seal, (because they had not the right seal of office to that purpose) contrary to their former earnest promise, and the bishop's right, and without any manner of warning or fore-knowledge thereof to him given;
3. and 4. To the 3d and 4th he says, That whereas he had granted to George Constantine the office of a register, who brought unto him a commission for the chancellorship, to be sealed and delivered to the aforesaid chaunter of St. David's, desiring the said bishop to seal it, he utterly refused so to do, because the said George had put therein a clause of admitting clerks into benefices: which authority the said bishop would not in any wise grant, reserving the examination and admission of clerks only to himself, for the avoiding of wicked bribery and partiality. Whereupon the said George and the chaunter promised the said bishop by their faith and truth, before three or four honest witnesses, not to execute that clause of institution into benefices, but only to those clerks whom the bishop did first examine and admit, and send unto them to be instituted and inducted; upon which promise the bishop sealed the said commission, and after that time the parsonage of Haskard being void, and by reason of lapse devolved to the bishop's gift for that time, he conferred it on one Henry Goddard, with a collation of institution by the king's authority, not extolling any foreign usurped authority. In which collation or institution is fully mentioned the renunciation of the bishop of Rome, and all foreign power and authority, with the full stile ⟨p. 518⟩of his majesty's supremacy. And this collation of the church of Huskard he gave, before he understood or knew that his chancellor had given out the like, and he surely thinketh his collation was the first. That notwithstanding, the said George Constantine, and the said chaunter having a vowson determined by reason of lapse, admitted and instituted one John Gough, to the said parsonage of Haskard, by virtue of their expired vowson, and sealed his institution with a wrong seal, (because they had not the right seal of office to that purpose) contrary to their former earnest promise, and the bishop's right, and without any manner of warning or fore-knowledge thereof to him given;
which thing by them untruly done, the said George Constantine nevertheless came to the bishop's house and there did write with his own hand the letters of induction for the said Henry Goddard, priest, comprising in the same the whole sum of the institution or collation which the said bishop had made, and the same George did seal the said letters of induction with his own hand, finding no manner of fault therein, nor making any word or mention of his and the chanter's former wrong doing, but so departed for that time. And afterwards he came again, and showed the bishop what they had done before concerning the parsonage aforesaid. And further, the said defendant saith, that he did not molest the said John Gough, but lawfully did call him in the king's majesty's name, not for any title of patronage, but to know whether he was parson of Haskard, and how he was thereto admitted, instituted, and inducted, and by what authority he presumed to preach there, without the king's majesty's licence, with other like lawful demands; whereunto he sturdily refused to give answer, and saith, that the article contained in his accusation, namely, "Item, He is interrogated under what title he holds the rectory of Haskard," was not ministered unto the party in that sort, so far as he knoweth, but in these words or like, "How did he get admission into the rectory," &c.
which thing by them untruly done, the said George Constantine nevertheless came to the bishop's house and there did write with his own hand the letters of induction for the said Henry Goddard, priest, comprising in the same the whole sum of the institution or collation which the said bishop had made, and the same George did seal the said letters of induction with his own hand, finding no manner of fault therein, nor making any word or mention of his and the chaunter's former wrong doing, but so departed for that time. And afterwards he came again, and shewed the bishop what they had done before concerning the parsonage aforesaid. And further, the said defendant saith, that he did not molest the said John Gough, but lawfully did call him in the king's majesty's name, not for any title of patronage, but to know whether he was parson of Haskard, and how he was thereto admitted, instituted, and inducted, and by what authority he presumed to preach there, without the king's majesty's licence, with other like lawful demands; whereunto he sturdily refused to give answer, and saith, that the article contained in his accusation, namely, "Item, He is interrogated under what title he holds the rectory of Haskard," was not ministered unto the party in that sort, so far as he knoweth, but in these words or like, "How did he get admission into the rectory," &c.
5. TO the 5th he saith, That albeit George Constantine, register, did wilfully withdraw his bounden service due to the king's highness, and to the said defendant in the king's name, refusing to attend either by himself, or his sufficient deputy for writing of records and other instruments, yet the said defendant made his collations and institutions in his own name, not by his own authority, nor by another, save only the king's authority, according as he hath declared in his answer to the first article, expressing in them the king's supremacy with the bishop's own name and seal of office, as he ought to do, according to the provision of the king's statute in such a case.
6. TO the 6th he saith, That the vicarage of Penbrin being void he, as right patron thereof to his knowledge, conferred it to John Evans, clerk, with letters of institution and induction; and after, when the king's presentation came to him for one David Jenkin, clerk, he desired fourteen days respite at that time, either to show ancient record for his right, and then the matter to stand to the determination of the law, or else if he showed not, both he and his clerk to give place to the king's clerk, which condition was by sir Thomas Jones, knight, Dr. Meyrick, and the said David Jenkin, received; and an institution with an induction was made conditionally to be put in the hands of sir Thomas Jones, knight, for safe custody of the king's clerks' behalf, after the fourteen days to be executed at the hands of the said defendant, if he failed to show. Within which time the said defendant did show an old ancient record, declaring the full right of patronage on the said defendant's behalf, and so that institution and induction was never by the said defendant put in execution. Nevertheless, the said David Jenkin (contrary to his promise and oath, giving thereupon his right hand to the said sir Thomas Jones, knight) took advantage by the said writing, without knowledge of the said defendant. After which time the lord chancellor, by his letters written to the said defendant, advertised him, to admit one John ap Powell, clerk, presented by virtue of the vowson which the lord chancellor judged to be good▪ and so to be admitted notwithstanding his former presentation, whereby he would not bar the other man's right. And so this defendant made one collation, two institutions, and three mandates, doing no wrong thereby to his knowledge. And further (he saith) that there was no business nor unquietness about the possession of the said vicarage, but this defendant giving place, was content to lose his right for that time.
6. TO the 6th he saith, That the vicarage of Penbrin being void he, as right patron thereof to his knowledge, conferred it to John Evans, clerk, with letters of institution and induction; and after, when the king's presentation came to him for one David Jenkin, clerk, he desired fourteen days respite at that time, either to shew ancient record for his right, and then the matter to stand to the determination of the law, or else if he shewed not, both he and his clerk to give place to the king's clerk, which condition was by sir Thomas Jones, knight, Dr. Meyrick, and the said David Jenkin, received; and an institution with an induction was made conditionally to be put in the hands of sir Thomas Jones, knight, for safe custody of the king's clerks' behalf, after the fourteen days to be executed at the hands of the said defendant, if he failed to shew. Within which time the said defendant did shew an old ancient record, declaring the full right of patronage on the said defendant's behalf, and so that institution and induction was never by the said defendant put in execution. Nevertheless, the said David Jenkin (contrary to his promise and oath, giving thereupon his right hand to the said sir Thomas Jones, knight) took advantage by the said writing, without knowledge of the said defendant. After which time the lord chancellor, by his letters written to the said defendant, advertised him, to admit one John ap Powell, clerk, presented by virtue of the vowson which the lord chancellor judged to be good and so to be admitted notwithstanding his former presentation, whereby he would not bar the other man's right. And so this defendant made one collation, two institutions, and three mandates, doing no wrong thereby to his knowledge. And further (he saith) that there was no business nor unquietness about the possession of the said vicarage, but this defendant giving place, was content to lose his right for that time.
7. TO the 7th he saith, That as he now remembereth, he never decreed any caveats to be made in benefices, neither did institute nor cause to be inducted any into benefices, being known to him litigious.
8. TO the 8th he saith, That because the archdeacons be absent from their offices, and have not had faithful diligent officials, he hath directed his mandates to them or their officials, or to other lawful persons in that behalf so far as he knoweth.
9 and 10. The 9th and 10th articles he denieth as very untrue.
11. TO the 11th, the saith, that whereas sir Thomas Jones, knight, advertised him, that Thomas Prichard had celebrated matrimony in a private house, betwixt a certain priest and woman, whose sister had refused the same, the said Prichard leaving his own cure unserved on that Sunday, this defendant did put the same Thomas Prichard to penance for so doing, marrying them without banns. And whereas he made the said Thomas Prichard, who is a bachelor of law, his commissary, it was for the respect of learning in the law, thereby faithfully to execute his office according to justice. And the said defendant did never favour nor bear with any man wittingly in his wrong doings. He confesseth that the matrimony was solemnized in a private church, and that the cure was that day unserved.
11. TO the 11th, the saith, that whereas sir Thomas Jones, knight, advertised him, that Thomas Prichard had celebrated matrimony in a private house, betwixt a certain priest and woman, whose sister had refused the same, the said Prichard leaving his own cure unserved on that Sunday, this defendant did put the same Thomas Prichard to penance for so doing, marrying them without banns. And whereas he made the said Thomas Prichard, who is a batchelor of law, his commissary, it was for the respect of learning in the law, thereby faithfully to execute his office according to justice. And the said defendant did never favour nor bear with any man wittingly in his wrong doings. He confesseth that the matrimony was solemnized in a private church, and that the cure was that day unserved.
12. TO the 12th he saith, That it is slanderous and utterly untrue. And that one John Hughes, priest, made Sage Hughes (daughter to his stepmother) a harlot at eleven years of age, and after married openly to another man, being minister thereof himself. After which doing he took her away from her husband again, and kept her alleging a former contract. And when the said John Hughes was lawfully convicted before the said bishop, in open court at Carmarthen, of that his abominable adultery, claiming the king's pardon thereof, yet the said Sage confessed, that he had to do with her the night before that day of appearance. Which later crime he denied. Nevertheless she proved with child, affirming, both before the birth and after, the child to be his, the midwife and others being witnesses thereof. Yet notwithstanding, George Constantine, as a wicked encourage• of the said priest in his naughty doings, with the help of the aforesaid chanter, first uttered […] Meredith Thomas was father of the said child: which matter was ordered in the ecclesiastical court according to justice, without any partial affection of the said bishop, or of any other to his knowledge.
12. TO the 12th he saith, That it is slanderous and utterly untrue. And that one John Hughes, priest, made Sage Hughes (daughter to his stepmother) a harlot at eleven years of age, and after married openly to another man, being minister thereof himself. After which doing he took her away from her husband again, and kept her alledging a former contract. And when the said John Hughes was lawfully convicted before the said bishop, in open court at Caermarthen, of that his abominable adultery, claiming the king's pardon thereof, yet the said Sage confessed, that he had to do with her the night before that day of appearance. Which later crime he denied. Nevertheless she proved with child, affirming, both before the birth and after, the child to be his, the midwife and others being witnesses thereof. Yet notwithstanding, George Constantine, as a wicked encourage• of the said priest in his naughty doings, with the help of the aforesaid chaunter, first uttered 〈…〉 Meredith Thomas was father of the said child: which matter was ordered in the ecclesiastical court according to justice, without any partial affection of the said bishop, or of any other to his knowledge.
13. TO the 13th he saith, It is utterly false so far as he knoweth.
14. TO the 14th he saith, That by lawful sequestration in the king's majesty's name, he committed the custody of the fruits of Langatnoke and Lanvihangel to two honest men, for the behoof of the king's first fruits and tenths, and of the next incumbent, and further he did not meddle nor minister any cause of unquietness in that behalf.
14. TO the 14th he saith, That by lawful sequestration in the king's majesty's name, he committed the custody of the fruits of Langatnoke and Lanvihangel to two honest men, for the behoof of the king's first fruits and tenths, and of the next inincumbent, and further he did not meddle nor minister any cause of unquietness in that behalf.
15. TO the 15th he saith, That he made a collation, (lawful, as he supposeth) of the prebend of Lanbister, to Stephen Greene, his chaplain, without any covenant or colour, and further he did not meddle in that behalf.
16. TO the 16th he saith, All is untrue as far as he knoweth.
17. TO the 17th he saith, It is untrue for his own part, and his officers, as far as he knoweth.
18. TO the 18th he saith, It is untrue as far as he knoweth, and that he did certify the recusants justly, as he thinketh, because they refused wilfully to pay the king's whole subsidy of their whole dividends, as it standeth in the king's book, pertaining to the canons resident.
19. TO the 19th he saith, That after a travel of fourteen miles, being not able fasting to celebrate the communion, in a chapel within the house of sir Thomas Jones, knight, one of the kings majesty's honourable council of the marches of Wales, this defendant celebrated matrimony without receiving the communion for the causes abovesaid, betwixt Mr. Griffith Rice, and the daughter of the said sir ⟨p. 520⟩Thomas Jones, according to the king's ordinances. And Thomas Prichard, priest administered the holy communion there without any superstition, to this defendant's knowledge: and the married persons not disposed to receive the holy communion, he could not compel them against their consciences, and saith, that he did not dispense with them, as it is contained in the article.
