M. Harding. The .6. Division.M. Hardinge. The .6. Diuision.

M. Harding. The .6. Division.

M. Hardinge. The .6. Diuision.

Neither S. Hieromes Translation of the Scriptures into the Dalmatical tongue (if any such was by him made at all) proveth that the Service was then in that Vulgar tongue. That labour may be thought, to have served to an other purpose. But of the Translation of the Scriptures into Vulgar tongues, I shall speak hereafter, when I shall come to that peculiar Article. Verily the handling of this present, and of that, hath most things common to both. Thus that the people of any Country,¹ had the Church Service in their Vulgar and common tongue, beside the Greek, and the Latin tongue, we leave as a matter stoutly affirmed by M. Ivel, but faintly proved: yea nothing at all proved.

Neither S. Hieromes Translation of the Scriptures into the Dalmatical tongue (if any such was by him made at al) prooueth that the Seruice was then in that Vulgare tongue. That labour may be thought, to haue serued to an other purpose. But of the Translation of the Scriptures into Vulgare tongues, I shal speake hereafter, when I shal come to that peculiar Article. Verely the handelinge of this present, and of that, hath moste thinges common to bothe. Thus that the people of any Countrie,¹ had the Churche Seruice in their Vulgare and common tongue, biside the Greeke, and the Latine tongue, wee leaue as a mater stoutely affirmed by M. Iuel, but fain•ly prooued: yea nothinge at al prooued.

1. 1See the .15. Division of this ArticleSee the .15. Diuision of this Article