A Reply to his fourth Chapter touching the distinction of Doctrines, Some fundamental others circumstantial and less Principal.A Reply to his fourth Chapter touching the distinction of Doctrines, Some fundamentall others circumstantiall and lesse Principall.

CHAP. 4. A Reply to his fourth Chapter touching the distinction of Doctrines, Some fundamental others circumstantial and less Principal.

CHAP. 4. A Reply to his fourth Chapter touching the distinction of Doctrines, Some fundamentall others circumstantiall and lesse Principall.

IN points of Doctrine (I said in my Answer to the Prisoners Letter) some are Fundamental, without right belief whereof, a man cannot be saved: others are circumstantial, and less Principal, wherein one man may differ from another in judgement, without prejudice of salvation on either part,

IN points of Doctrine (I said in my Answer to the Prisoners Letter) some are Fundamentall, without right beleife whereof, a man cannot be saved: others are circumstantiall, and lesse Principall, wherein one man may differ from another in judgement, without prejudice of salvation on either part,

Discusser.

To this distinction (He saith) Truth dare not subscribe, for then thousands ten thousands should everlastingly be condemned, yea the whole Generation of the Righteous, who since the falling away, have and do err fundamently concerning the true matter, Constitution, Gathering, Governing of the Church. And yet far be it from any pious Breast, to Imagine that they are not saved &c.

To this distinction (He saith) Truth dare not subscribe, for then thousands ten thousands should everlastingly be condemned, yea the whole Generation of the Righteous, who since the falling away, have and doe erre fundamently concerning the true matter, Constitution, Gathering, Governing of the Church. And yet farre be it from any pious Breast, to Imagine that they are not saved &c.