A Reply to his Chap. 66.
pp. 135–13713 passages
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
CHAP. 63. A Reply to his Chap. 66.
Discusser.
HE ends this passage with approbation of Queen Elizabeth for Persecuting the Papists, and a reproof to King James for Persecuting the Puritans.
HE ends this passage with approbation of Queene Elizabeth for Persecutiag the Papists, and a reproofe to King James for Persecuting the Puritans.
Defender.
I neither did in terms approve the persecution of the one, nor reprove the persecution of the other. The words I spake of them are recited above. Chap. 58. which contain an Historical Narration of the Res gestas in this case of both the Princes, but neither approvement, nor reprovement of them. It was enough to answer the Prisoners Argument, that as great Princes as the three named by him for Toleration, might be named against Toleration: As Queen Elizabeth for one, and King James for another, who persecuted Puritans though he Tolerated Papists.
I neither did in termes approve the persecution of the one, nor reprove the persecution of the other. The words I spake of them are recited above. Chap. 58. which containe an Historicall Narration of the Res gestas in this case of both the Princes, but neither approvement, nor reprovement of them. It was enough to answer the Prisoners Argument, that as great Princes as the three named by him for Toleration, might be named against Toleration: As Queene Elizabeth for one, and King James for another, who persecuted Puritans though he Tolerated Papists.