A01532:162
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 2: Division 2.Part 2 › Division 2: Diuision 2.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
to wit, that we must in either regard not so much what our bodily eye seeth, as what the spiritual eye of the believing soul by faith apprehendeth, and upon ground of Gods word believeth: and that by things sensible are things intelligible conveyed to us, and effected in us as well in the one as in the other.
to wit, that we must in either regard not so much what our bodily eye seeth, as what the spirituall eye of the beleeuing soule by faith apprehendeth, and vpon ground of Gods word beleeueth: and that by things sensible are things intelligible conueighed to vs, and effected in vs as well in the one as in the other.
The 2. place of Chrysostom is out of his 3. book de Sacerdotio. Wherein this alleger of him fareth as ill as in the former allegation. Chrysost. saith indeed that Christ that sitteth above with his Father in heaven, is qat that time (to wit, when the Eucharist is celebrated) held in the hands of each one, and offereth himself to those, that will clasp him about and embrace him. But not to insist upon what was above said by him, that Christ himself and not Man both there and in Baptism administereth; nor upon other phrases in the same place used by him, both before of the same Eucharist, that rthe people are all died purple red in it with Christs blood; and afterward of Baptism, that in it swe are buried together with Christ: Which cannot be understood but figuratively: he showeth in the very next words to those here cited, what his meaning was in them, and how all this is done, when he saith; tAnd this they do all then with the eyes of faith.
The 2. place of Chrysostome is out of his 3. booke de Sacerdotio. Wherein this alleadger of him fareth as ill as in the former allegation. Chrysost. saith indeed that Christ that sitteth aboue with his Father in heauen, is