A01532:504
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 13: Division 13.Part 2 › Division 13: Diuision 13.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But many eat of the Eucharist that are unfaithful, and are out of Christ: Ergò, &c.
But many eate of the Eucharist that are vnfaithfull, and are out of Christ: Ergò, &c.
The Proposition of this latter Syllogism he denieth, and saith it is a mere falsehood: and why so? forsooth they deny it themselves. And why do they so? because the holy Fathers say that Judas and the Corinthians blamed by S. Paul, did receive Christs body, as the Apostles words evidently import.
The Proposition of this latter Syllogisme he denyeth, and saith it is a meere falshood: and why so? forsooth they deny it themselues. And why doe they so? because the holy Fathers say that Iudas and the Corinthians blamed by S. Paul, did receiue Christs body, as the Apostles words evidently import.
1. For the Apostle, he saith expressly, hHe that eateth this bread: as plainly as can be telling us more then once or twice, that it was bread that they did eat, though termed also Christs body (as hath oft been said, and as Augustine showeth) because a Sacrament of it.
1. For the Apostle, he saith expresly, hHe that eateth this bread: as plainely as can bee telling vs more then once or twice, that it was bread that they did eat, though tearmed also Christs body (as hath oft beene said, and as Augustine sheweth) because a Sacrament of it.