A01532:517
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 14: Division 14.Part 2 › Division 14: Diuision 14.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. That though these things be done to or befall the Sacrament, yet Christs body being now glorious and impassible, and after a spiritual and indivisible manner present, it can no more thereby be broken and abused then Angels in assumed bodies can be wounded, or Christs Deity was wounded or pierced on the Cross.
1. That though these things be done to or befall the Sacrament, yet Christs body being now glorious and impassible, and after a spirituall and indiuisible manner present, it can no more thereby be broken and abused then Angels in assumpted bodies can be wounded, or Christs Deity was wounded or pierced on the Crosse.
1. We take what he granteth. Christs body is now glorious and impassible: and therefore not subject unto such indignities, as these creatures are: and the one consequently is not the other. Yea, is Christs body it self impassible? What is it then, that (as Origen speaketh) goeth into the draught? &c. which this Defendant taketh no notice of, because he knoweth not what to say to it. Or let him resolve what those ashes, that they will to be reserved for relics or what those mites are made of, that breed in the consecrated bread, when either they burn it, and so deal with it as they do with Heretics, or reserve it over long.
1. We take what hee granteth. Christs body is now glorious and impassible: and therefore not subiect vnto such indignities, as these creatures are: and the one consequently is not the other. Yea, is Christs body it self impassible? What is it then, that (as Origen speaketh) goeth into the draught? &c. which this Defendant taketh no notice of, because hee knoweth not what to say to it. Or let him resolue what those ashes, that they will to be reserued for reliques or what those mites are made of, that breed in the consecrated bread, when either they burne it, and so deale with it as they doe with Heretickes, or reserue it ouer long.