A01532:546
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 14: Division 14.Part 2 › Division 14: Diuision 14.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2. In regard of the person offering, or the offerer; because he was offered immediately in the one, whereas he is offered by a Minister or Priest in the other. And yet this fellow telleth us, that the sacrifice of the Mass is not distinct from ⟨p. 203⟩he sacrifice of the Cross, but is the same both in the host, and the chief offerer thereof. These things hang together like harp and harrow, as they say. But our great Doctor (it seemeth) for all his bragging and blustering, is but a Novice; and is not yet throughly acquainted with his Master Bellarmines doctrine in all points, though he make use of him otherwise.
2. In regard of the person offering, or the offerer; because he was offered immediately in the one, whereas he is offered by a Minister or Priest in the other. And yet this fellow telleth vs, that the sacrifice of the Masse is not distinct from ⟨p. 203⟩he sacrifice of the Crosse, but is the same both in the hoast, and the chiefe offerer thereof. These things hang together like harp and harrow, as they say. But our great Doctor (it seemeth) for all his bragging and blustering, is but a Nouice; and is not yet throughly acquainted with his Master Bellarmines doctrine in all points, though hee make vse of him otherwise.
§ 5. He telleth us that all Christian Nations in the world, Grecians, Ruthenians, Armenians, Mozaribites, Catayans, Ethiopians, Indians, &c. conspire with them in the celebration and true belief of this Sacrifice, and Sacrament.
§ 5. Hee telleth vs that all Christian Nations in the world, Grecians, Rutenians, Armenians, Mozaribites, Catayans, Ethiopians, Indians, &c. conspire with them in the celebration and true beliefe of this Sacrifice, and Sacrament.