A01532:582
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 14: Division 14.Part 2 › Division 14: Diuision 14.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
as the Apostle faith, that rChrist was crucified in the sight of the Galatians, who in likely hood many of them never saw piece of his Cross: and as August. saith, she lies not, that saith that Christ is immolated on Easter day, in regard of the similitude that that Sacrament hath of his passion, that that day is celebrated: and in like manner may it very well be understood, when he saith that Christs blood is in the Cup. Nor hindereth it, but that this speech of Chrysostom may be taken tropically, because he saith, tThat that flowed out of Christs side: (as uAugustine also, though no friend to Transubstantiation, is reported to say the same) no more then it would have hindered, but that the Apostles words might have bin taken figuratively (as Caietan also well observeth) hough of the Rock he should have said, That Rock was that Christ, that was crucified, and died, and rose again from the dead.
as the Apostle faith, that rChrist was crucified in the sight of the Galatians, who in likely hood many of them neuer saw peece of his Crosse: and as August. saith, she lies not, that saith that Christ is immolated on Easterday, in regard of the similitude that that Sacrament hath of his passion, that that day is celebrated: and in like manner may it very well be vnderstood, when hee saith that Christs blood is in the Cup. Nor hindreth it, but that this speech of Chrysostome may be taken tropically, because he saith, tThat that flowed out of Christs side: (as uAugustine also, though no friend to Transubst antiation, is reported to say the same) no more then it would haue hindered, but that the Apostles words might haue bin takē figuratiuely (as Caietan also well obserueth) hough of the Rocke hee should haue said, That Rocke was that Christ, that was crucified, and died, and rose againe from the dead.