A01540:285
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and use of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have been made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiency of his answers given to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecility of his arguments produced against the same further discovered; and the point it self in controversy more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and vse of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have beene made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiencie of his answers giuen to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecillitie of his arguments produced against the same further discouered; and the point it selfe in controuersie more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.
London: printed by John Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623London: printed by Iohn Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Now to come to Mr. Gs. last Reason, which like1 an Orator he amplifieth, to leave a deep impression behind. But let it be well considered, as in it self, so whether it prove that the use of Lots in Game is not against Gods word, but hath sufficient warrant from it, as he pretendeth in his introduction, p. 136.
Now to come to Mr. Gs. last Reason, which like1 an Orator he amplifieth, to leaue a deepe impression behinde. But let it be well considered, as in it selfe, so whether it proue that the vse of Lots in Game is not against Gods word, but hath sufficient warrant from it, as he pretendeth in his introduction, p. 136.
- 1I. B. Answer.
What Rhetorical amplifications Mr. B. findeth in1 this Argument, those may well wonder, that know what Rhetorical Amplifications are. But be it Logical or Rhetorical, hear, I pray you, not it, but one that Mr. B. hath put into the room of it.
What Rhetoricall amplifications Mr. B. findeth in1 this Argument, those may well wonder, that know what Rhetoricall Amplifications are. But be it Logicall or Rhetoricall, heare, I pray you, not it, but one that Mr. B. hath put into the roome of it.