A01540:520
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and use of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have been made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiency of his answers given to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecility of his arguments produced against the same further discovered; and the point it self in controversy more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and vse of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have beene made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiencie of his answers giuen to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecillitie of his arguments produced against the same further discouered; and the point it selfe in controuersie more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.
London: printed by John Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623London: printed by Iohn Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
If of the sanctification and appropriation not of the whole kind, but of some particulars of the kind, the premisses might be granted, and yet nothing concluded against the use of Lots in general.
If of the sanctification and appropriation not of the whole kind, but of some particulars of the kind, the premisses might bee granted, and yet nothing concluded against the vse of Lots in generall.
If of the whole kind, the Proposition is true, though the proof be not so pertinent; but the Assumption is not sound.
If of the whole kinde, the Proposition is true, though the proofe be not so pertinent; but the Assumption is not sound.
For the proof of it out of mSolomon: that place showeth only nhow a Lot may well and wisely be used; but neither enjoineth that use of it, nor restraineth it thereunto. It approveth only the use as good and commendable in that kind: But it is one thing for a Lot to be used well and wisely to that end; and another thing to have that the proper or only end of it.
For the proofe of it out of mSalomon: that place sheweth onely nhow a Lot may well and wisely be vsed; but neither inioyneth that vse of it, nor restraineth it thereunto. It approueth onely the vse as good and commendable in that kinde: But it is one thing for a Lot to bee vsed well and wisely to that end; and another thing to haue that the proper or onely end of it.