A01760:1035
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our own arguments [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the answers and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Morton ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our ovvne argumemts [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the ansvveres and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Mortoune ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.
Leiden: printed by W. Christiaens, 1637
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But now having heard B. Lindsey; let us hear what tPaybody will Sect. III •ay. He taketh him to another subterfuge, and tells us, that though we read that Christ took Bread whiles they did eat, yet can it not be concluded hence, that he took Bread whiles they did sit: because saith he, As they did eat, is expounded by uLuke and xPaul, to be After they bad done eating, or after Supper. Thus is their language divided. B. Lindsey did yield to us, that when Christ took Bread, they were sitting, and his conjecture was, that this gesture of sitting might have been changed after the taking of the Bread. Paybody saw that he had done with the Argument, if he should grant, that they were sitting when Christ took Bread, therefore he calleth that in question. Vulcans own gimmers could not make his answer and the Bishops to stick together.
But now having heard B. Lindsey; let us heare what tPaybody will Sect. III •ay. He taketh him to another subterfuge, and tels us, that though we read that Christ tooke Bread whiles they did eate, yet can it not be concluded hence, that he tooke Bread whiles they did sit: because saith he, As they did eate, is expounded by uLuke and xPaul, to be After they bad done eating, or after Supper. Thus is their language divided. B. Lindsey did yeeld to us, that when Christ tooke Bread, they were sitting, and his conjecture was, that this gesture of sitting might have been changed after the taking of the Bread. Paybody saw that he had done with the Argument, if he should graunt, that they were sitting when Christ tooke Bread, therefore he calleth that in question. Vulcans owne gimmers could not make his answer and the Bishops to sticke togither.
- t