A01760:1042
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our own arguments [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the answers and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Morton ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our ovvne argumemts [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the ansvveres and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Mortoune ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.
Leiden: printed by W. Christiaens, 1637
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
4. That there were two Suppers before the Eucharistical, they gather from Joh. 13. For first, the Paschal Supper was ended vers. 2. after which Christ washed his Disciples feet. And thereafter we read vers. 12. gResumptis vestibus rursum ad caenam ordinariam consedisse. The dividing of the Passover into two services or two Suppers, had no warrant at all from the first institution of that Sacrament: for which cause, they think it not likely, that Christ would have thus Dividedit, according to the device & custom of the Jews in later times; for so much as in Marriage, (and much more in the Passover) he did not allow of that which from the beginning was not so. Neither seemeth it to them any way probable, that Christ would have interrupted the eating of the Passover with the washing of his Disciples feet, before the whole Paschal Supper was ended, and they had done eating of it.
4. That there were two Suppers before the Eucharisticall, they gather from Ioh. 13. For first, the Paschall Supper was ended vers. 2. after which Christ washed his Disciples feet. And thereafter we read vers. 12. gResumptis vestibus rursum ad caenam ordinariam consedisse. The dividing of the Passeover into two services or two Suppers, had no warrant at all from the first institution of that Sacrament: for which cause, they thinke it not likely, that Christ would have thus Dividedit, according to the device & custome of the Iewes in later times; for so much as in Mariage, (and much more in the Pesseover) he did not allow of that which from the beginning was not so. Neither seemeth it to them any way probable, that Christ would have interrupted the eating of the Passeover with the washing of his Disciples feet, before the whole Paschall Supper was ended, and they had done eating of it.
- gpar. ubi supra.