A01760:1088
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our own arguments [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the answers and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Morton ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our ovvne argumemts [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the ansvveres and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Mortoune ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.
Leiden: printed by W. Christiaens, 1637
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The other law of war which Junius upon Deut. 20. observeth, ⟨p. 38⟩prescribed to the Israelites, how they should deal with them who refused their peace. And here only was the difference made betwixt the Cities which were very far off, and the Cities of the Canaanites, Deut. 20. 15. 16. But the first law was common; as hath been proven.
The other law of warre which Iunius upon Deut. 20. observeth, ⟨p. 38⟩prescribed to the Israelites, how they should deale with them who refused their peace. And here onely was the difference made betwixt the Cities which were very farre off, and the Cities of the Canaanites, Deut. 20. 15. 16. But the first law was common; as hath been proven.
Joseph Hall seemeth to deny, that the Oath of the Princes of Israel, had any power to bind, but upon another ground then D Forbesse took to himself. It would seem very questionable, saith kHall, Whether Joshua needed to hold himself bound to this Oath: for fraudulent conventions oblige not: and Israel had put in a direct caveat of their vicinity.
Ioseph Hall seemeth to deny, that the Oath of the Princes of Israel, had any power to bind, but upon another ground then D Forbesse tooke to himself. It would seeme very questionable, saith k