A01760:269
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our own arguments [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the answers and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Morton ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our ovvne argumemts [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the ansvveres and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Mortoune ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.
Leiden: printed by W. Christiaens, 1637
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2. How knows he, that they who were offended at Paul his taking of wages at Corinth, thought not his taking of wages there unlawful, even as we think the Ceremonies unlawful?
2. How knowes he, that they who were offended at Paul his taking of wages at Corinth, thought not his taking of wages there unlawfull, even as we thinke the Ceremonies unlawfull?
3. Why judgeth he that we are not scandalized through weakness, but through malice and contumacy? So he giveth it forth both in this place, and gelse where. Who art thou that judgeth another mans servant?
3. Why judgeth he that we are not scandalized through weaknesse, but through malice and contumacy? So he giveth it forth both in this place, and gelse where. Who art thou that judgeth another mans servant?
- gIren. lib. 1. cap. 10. §. 2.
But 4. If we were malicious in offending at the Ceremonies as things unlawful, and in urging of Non-conformity as necessary, should they therefore contemn our being scandalized? Those that would have Titus circumcised, were they not malicious? Did they not urge Circumcision as necessary? Held they it not unlawful, not to circumcise Titus? yet did the Apostle abstain, because they were to be scandalized, that is, made worse and more wicked calumniators, by the circumcising of Titus, as