A01760:273
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our own arguments [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the answers and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Morton ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our ovvne argumemts [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the ansvveres and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Mortoune ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.
Leiden: printed by W. Christiaens, 1637
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
6. Why holds he us contemners of the Church, for not receiving the five Articles of Perth? we can not be called contemners for not obeying, but for not subjecting our selves, wherewith we can not be charged. Could he not distinguish betwixt subjection and obedience? Art thou a Doctor in Israel, and knowest not these things? Nay, art thou a Conformist, and knowest not what thy ifellow Conformists do hold?
6. Why holds he us contemners of the Church, for not receiving the five Articles of Perth? we can not be called contemners for not obeying, but for not subjecting our selves, wherewith we can not be charged. Could he not distinguish betwixt subjection and obedience? Art thou a Doctor in Israell, and knowest not these things? Nay, art thou a Conformist, and knowest not what thy ifellow Conformists doe hold?
- iField of the Church lib. 4. cap. 34. & Bils. apud Parker of the Cross part. 2. pag. 33.Field of the Church lib. 4. cap. 34. & Bils. apud Parker of the Crosse part. 2. pag. 33.
One point more resteth, at which kthe Dr. holdeth him in this Argument, namely, that for the offence of the weak, necessary Sect. XIII things are not to be omitted, such as is obedience to Superiors, but their minds are to be better informed.
One point more resteth, at which kthe Dr. holdeth him in this Argument, namely, that for the offence of the weake, necessary Sect. XIII things are not to be omitted, such as is obedience to Superiours, but their mindes are to be better informed.