A01760:606
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our own arguments [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the answers and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Morton ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our ovvne argumemts [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the ansvveres and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Mortoune ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.
Leiden: printed by W. Christiaens, 1637
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
What can be more plain, then that antiquity cannot be a confirmation to error, nor custom a prejudice to trueth?
What can be more plaine, then that antiquity cannot be a confirmation to errour, nor custome a prejudice to trueth?
3. There was a custom in the Churches of God, to give the Sect. XIV holy Communion to Infants, & another custom to minister Baptism only ⟨p. 106⟩about Easter and Pentecost: Sundry such abuses got place in the Church.
3. There vvas a custome in the Churches of God, to give the Sect. XIV holy Communion to Infants, & another custome to minister Baptismeonly ⟨p. 106⟩about Easter and Pentecost: Sundry such abuses got place in the Church.