A01760:698
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our own arguments [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the answers and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Morton ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our ovvne argumemts [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the ansvveres and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Mortoune ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.
Leiden: printed by W. Christiaens, 1637
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
5. Whereas the B. leaveth all things external, which pertain to the worship of God, to be governed by Princes, I object that the version Sect. 4 of the holy Scripture out of Hebrew and Greek into the vulgar tongue, is an external thing, belonging to the worship of God, yet it cannot be governed by a Prince who is not learned in the original tongues.
5. Whereas the B. leaveth all things externall, which pertaine to the worship of God, to be governed by Princes, I object that the version Sect. 4 of the holy Scripture out of Hebrew and Grèeke into the vulgar tongue, is an externall thing, belonging to the worship of God, yet it cannot be governed by a Prince who is not learned in the originall tounges.
6. Whereas he yieldeth to Princes the power of governing in spiritualibus, but not in pure spiritualibus, I cannot comprehend this Distinction. All sacred and Ecclesiastical things belonging to the worship of God are spiritual things.
6. Whereas he yeeldeth to Princes the power of governing in spiritualibus, but not in pure spiritualibus, I cannot comprehend this Distinction. All sacred and Ecclesiasticall things belonging to the worship of God are spirituall things.
What then understands he by things purely spiritual? If he mean things which are in such sort spiritual, that they have nothing earthly not external in them; in this sense the Sacraments are not purely spiritual, because they consist of two parts; one earthly, and another heavenly, as Ireneus saith of the Eucharist. And so the Sacraments not being things purely spiritual, shall be left to the power and government of Princes. If it be said, that by things purely spiritual, he means things which concern our Spirits only, and not the outward man; I still urge the same Instance: For the Sacraments are not in this sense spiritual, because a part of the Sacraments, to wit, the Sacramental Signs or Elements, concern our external & bodily senses of seeing, touching, and tasting.