A01760:92
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our own arguments [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the answers and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Morton ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our ovvne argumemts [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the ansvveres and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Mortoune ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.
Leiden: printed by W. Christiaens, 1637
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Tilen lendeth the cause another lift, and tanswereth, •hat no sober Sect. II man will say, permissionem Dei, principibus suum circa res medias jus ⟨p. 21⟩imminuere, num enim ob permissum hominibus dominium in volucres caeli, in pisces maris, & bestias agri, impiae fuerint leges principum, quibus aucupii, piscationis, & venationis libertatem, subditis aliis indulgent, aliis adimunt. Ans. That case and this are very different. For every particular man hath not dominion and power over all Fowls, Fishes, & Beasts, (else, beside that Princes should have no privilege of inhibiting the use of those things, there should be no propriety of heritage, and possession among subjects:) but power over all these is given to mankind. uPareus observeth, hominem collective intelligi in that place, Gen. 1. 26. and xJunius observeth, nomen Adam de specie esse in telligendum. But each particular man, & not mankind alone, is permitted to labour six days. Wherefore it is plain, that mans liberty is not abridged in the other case, as in this, because mankind hath dominion over these Creatures, when some men only do exercise the same, as well as if all men did exercise it.
Tilen lendeth the cause another lift, and tansweareth, •hat no sober Sect. II man will say, permissionem Dei, principibus suum circa res medias jus ⟨p. 21⟩imminuere, num enim ob permissum hominibus dominium in volucres caeli, in pisces maris, & bestias agri, impiae fuerint leges principum, quibus aucupii, piscationis, & venationis libertatem, subditis aliis indulgent, aliis adimunt. Ans. That case and this are very different. For every particular man hath not dominion and power over all Foules, Fishes, & Beasts, (else, beside that Princes should have no priviledge of inhibiting the use of those things, there should be no propriety of heritage, and possession among subjects:) but power over all these is given to mankinde.