A01760:941
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our own arguments [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the answers and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Morton ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our ovvne argumemts [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the ansvveres and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Mortoune ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.
Leiden: printed by W. Christiaens, 1637
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
I perceive what the D. would answer. For he gsaith; if a woman marry in the Lord, this action is good respectu adjecti modi, quamvis in se sit media & libera, etiam quo ad individuum. Implying, that if on the other part an individual action be necessary, (as for example the action of hearing the Word,) then it is in it selfe good, etiam quo ad individuum.
I perceave what the D. would answer. For he gsaith; if a woman marry in the Lord, this action is good respectu adjecti modi, quamvis in se sit media & libera, etiam quo ad individuum. Implying, that if on the other part an individuall action be necessary, (as for example the action of hearing the Word,) then it is in it selfe good, etiam quo ad individuum.
- gubi supra cap. 13. §. 7.
But I reply, what means he by these words, in se? means he the individual nature of the action? Nay; then the sense shall be no other then this, quo ad individuum, etiam quo ad individuum, And besides the D. can not define to us, any other nature in a individual thing, then the nature of the species or kind.
But I reply, what meanes he by these words, in se? meanes he the individuall nature of the action? Nay; then the sence shall bee no other then this, quo ad individuum, etiam quo ad individuum, And besides the D. can not define to us, any other nature in a individuall thing, then the nature of the species or kinde.