A01760:979
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our own arguments [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the answers and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Morton ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our ovvne argumemts [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the ansvveres and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Mortoune ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.
Leiden: printed by W. Christiaens, 1637
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
These considerations being premitted, for resolution of the Sect. IV question in hand, we say, 1. As touching these actions which proceed from bare imagination, whether they be evil and inordinate quo ad speciem, forsomuch as the imagination from which they have their original, doth not in those actions subject it self to the conduct and moderation of reason, but is like Gchazi, running away ⟨p. 12⟩without his masters leave, let the learned give their judgement. Howsoever, it can not be denied, uthat such actions may be and are of en evill quo ad individuum, or in respect of the circumstances, which show forth in them reprovable temerity, incogitancy, levity, and undecency. But such actions belong not to our purpose.
These considerations beeing premitted, for resolution of the Sect. IV question in hand, we say, 1. As touching these actions which proceed from bare imagination, whether they be evill and inordinate quo ad speciem, forsomuch as the imagination from which they have their originall, doth not in those actions subject it self to the conduct and moderation of reason, but is like Gchazi, running away ⟨p. 12⟩without his masters leave, let the learned give their judgement. Howsoever, it can not be denied, uthat such actions may be and are of en evill quo ad individuum, or in respect of the circumstances, which shew forth in them reproveable temerity, incogitancy, levity, and undecency. But such actions belong not to our purpose.
- uAmes. lib 3 de consc. cap. 8. q. 5.
2. As for those actions which proceed from the deliberation of reason, howbeit many of them be indifferent quo ad speciem, yet none of them is, nor can be indifferent quo ad individuum. The reason of this difference and distinction is,