A01760:994
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not…
A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our own arguments [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the answers and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Morton ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.A dispute against the English-popish ceremonies, obtruded vpon the Church of Scotland Wherein not only our ovvne argumemts [sic] against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the ansvveres and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Mortoune ... Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted.
Leiden: printed by W. Christiaens, 1637
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The D. thinks it enough, that in the use of a thing indifferent, Sect. IX I believe it is lawful for me to do this thing, albeit I believe and certainly know, that it is lawful to me to omit it, or to do the contrary; so that the doing of a thing in faith, inferreth not the necessity of doing it. But for answer hereunto, we say,
The D. thinkes it enough, that in the use of a thing indifferent, Sect. IX I beleeve it is lawfull for me to doe this thing, albeit I beleeve and certainly know, that it is lawfull to me to omit it, or to doe the contrary; so that the doing of a thing in faith, inferreth not the necessity of doing it. But for answere hereunto, we say,
1. We have sufficiently proven, that it is never lawful for us to do any thing which is in the nature of it indifferent, except we be ⟨p. 17⟩persuaded not only of the lawfulness of the thing, but of the expediency of doing it.
1. We have sufficiently proven, that it is never lawfull for us to doe any thing which is in the nature of it indifferent, except we be ⟨p. 17⟩perswaded not only of the lawfullnesse of the thing, but of the expediency of doing it.
2. Of his comparing of things indifferent together, and not considering them positively & by themselves, we have also said enough before.
2. Of his comparing of things indifferent togither, and not considering them positively & by themselves, we have also said enough before.