A04468:1297
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to…A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to…
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to a certain book lately set forth by M. Harding, and entitled, A confutation of &c. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Elephant, by Henry Wykes, Anno 1567. 27. OctobrisImprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes, Anno 1567. 27. Octobris
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But, M. Harding, if the same Holy Father Paphnutius weigh so much of your side, as you pretend, wherefore then doth One of your Companions of Louvain so lightly, & so disdainfully control that whole Story, with the utter discredit, and condemnation of the Writers? For thus hath he not doubted to publish his judgement therein to all the world: 1Mihi, nescio quomodo, in dubium venit fides huius Historiae de Paphnutio. Sunt enim, quae suspicionem important, eam esse Arianorum, aut Impudicorum hominum Commentum. Tota enim haec res à Socrate pendet, & Sozomeno: quorum alter Novatianus fuit: alter Theodorum Mopsuestensem à quinta Synodo damnatum magnis laudibus extulit: I know not how, this Story of Paphnutius seemeth to me to be of doubtful credit. For there be matters, that make me to suspect, that it is but a vain forged tale, either of the Arian Heretics, or of some other filthy persons. The whole matter hangeth of Socrates, and Sozomenus: Of which two, the one was a Novatian Heretic: The other highly commendeth Theodorus of Mopsuesta, being condemned by the Fifth Council.
But, M. Hardinge, if the same Holy Father Paphnutius weighe so mutche of your side, as you pretende, wherefore then dothe One of your Companions of Louaine so lightly, & so disdainefully controlle that whole Storie, with the vtter discredite, and condemnation of the Writers? For thus hath he not doubted to publishe his iudgemente therein to al the worlde: 1Mihi, nescio quomodo, in dubium venit fides huius Historiae de Paphnutio. Sunt enim, quae suspicionem important, eam esse Arianorum, aut Impudicorum hominum Commentum. Tota enim haec res à Socrate pendet, & Sozomeno: quorum alter Nouatianus fuit: alter Theodorum Mopsuestensem à quinta Synodo damnatum magnis laudibus extulit: I knowe not howe, this Storie of Paphnutius seemeth to mee to be of doubteful credite. For there be maters, that make mee to suspecte, that it is but a vaine forged tale, either of the Arian Heretiques, or of somme other filthy personnes. The whole mater hangeth of Socrates, and Sozomenus: Of whiche twoo, the one was a Nouatian Heretique: The other highly commendeth Theodorus of Mopsuesta, beinge condemned by the Fifthe Councel.
- 1Copus Dialog• 1. Pagi. 154.