A04468:1306
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to…A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to…
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to a certain book lately set forth by M. Harding, and entitled, A confutation of &c. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Elephant, by Henry Wykes, Anno 1567. 27. OctobrisImprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes, Anno 1567. 27. Octobris
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
If all this will not suffice, 1I refer me self to Chrysostoms own omes Words. Thus he writeth: S. Paul restraineth Unchaste persons, not permitting them, that have married two wives, to be Chosen to the government of the Church. His reasons be these, 2Nam qui uxori, quae decessit (à see) benevolentiam nullam seruasse deprehenditur, quo pacto potest ille esse bonus Praeceptor Ecclesiae? Imò quibus criminibus non subijcitur in dies? Nostis enim, quòd, etsi per Leges Secundae nuptiae permittuntur, tamen ea res accusationibus multis patet: For he that is found, to have borne no good will unto his wife, (not that is dead, but ) that is gone from him, how can he be a meet Master for the Church of God? Nay rather to what quarrels, and accusations (by mean of these two Wives) shall he not be subject every day? For you know, although by the Law the Marriage of the Second Wife (after the Divorce of the first) be suffered, yet the matter lieth open to many offences.
If al this wil not suffise, 1I referre mee selfe to Chrysostomes owne omes Woordes. Thus he writeth: S. Paule restreineth Vnchaste personnes, not permitting them, that haue married tvvoo vviues, to be Chosen to the gouernmente of the Churche. His reasons be these, 2Nam qui vxori, quae decessit (à se) beneuolentiam nullam seruasse deprehenditur, quo pacto potest ille esse bonus Praeceptor Ecclesiae? Imò quibus criminibus non subijcitur in dies? Nostis enim, quòd, etsi per Leges Secundae nuptiae permittuntur, tamen ea res accusationibus multis patet: For he that is founde, to haue borne no good wil vnto his wife, (not that is deade, but ) that is gonne from him, howe can he be a meete Maister for the Churche of God? Nai rather to what quarrelles, and accusations (by meane of these twoo Wiues) shal he not be subiect euery daie? For you know, although by the Lawe the Marriage of the Seconde VVife (after the Diuorce of the firste) be suffered, yet the mater lieth open to many offences.
- 1Marriage in Holy Orders.