A04474:2288
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 6 › The. B. of Salisbury.Article 6 › The. B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
S. Augustine saith, Christus ferebatur in manibus suis. Christ was borne in his own hands. These words are often alleged, and seem at the view to sound somewhat of M. Hardinges side. But being well weighed, & considered, they discharge them self, and are soon answered. First it is known, and confessed, that S. Augustine in reporting these words, either by mean of the Translation, or by some other error, was much overseen, and alleged that for Scripture, that in deed neither is any portion of the Scripture, nor else where to be found. For where he saith, David was borne in his own hands, the very Te•te is this, Collabebatur in manibus eorum: He went reeling in their hands. 1And so S. Basil allegeth,2 and expoundeth the same place,[Greek or Hebrew], Carried a long in the servants hands. And thus S. Augustine being deceived in the Text, was fain, to force the same to some violent Construction.
S. Augustine saith, Christus ferebatur in manibus suis. Christe was borne in his owne handes. These woordes are often alleged, and séeme at the viewe to sounde somewhat of M. Hardinges side. But beinge wel weighed, & considered, they discharge them selfe, and are soone answeared. First it is knowen, and confessed, that S. Augustine in reportinge these woordes, either by meane of the Translation, or by some other errour, was muche ouerséene, and alleged that for Scripture, that in déede neither is any portion of the Scripture, nor els where to be founde. For where he saithe, Dauid was borne in his owne handes, the very Te•te is this, Collabebatur in manibus eorum: He wente reylinge in their handes. 1And so S. Basile allegeth,2 and expoundeth the same place,〈non-Latin alphabet〉, Caried a longe in the seruantes handes. And thus S. Augustine being deceiued in the Texte, was faine, to force the same to some violent Construction.
- 1