A04474:235
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 1 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 1 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Hereof he concludeth, that we have nothing but a bare Communion: which Conclusion is as true, as the Premisses. God's name be blessed, we h•ue a holy Communion, to the great comfort of the godly. But in M. Hardinges Mass there is neither Communion, nor any other consolation at all: but only a number of light and bare gestures, and Ceremonies, far unmeet for so grave a purpose. But what should move this man, thus scornfully to jest at the holy Ministration,1 and to call Christs ordinance A bare Communion? Others call it the Mystical Supper: others the holy Distribution: bare, or naked, no man I trow, durst ever to call it, but M. Harding. One of his own Doctors comparing Consecration,2 and Communion together, saith thus: Communio sacra maior est in effectu sanctitatis, quam Consecratio. The holy Communion in effect of Holiness, is more then Consecration. And againe, Consecratio est propter Communionem. Ergo, 3Communio maius est Consecratione: Consecration is for Communion: Therefore is Communion greater then Consecration.
Hereof he concludeth, that wée haue nothinge but a bare Communion: whiche Conclusion is as true, as the Premisses. Goddes name be blessed, wée h•ue a holy Communion, to the greate comforte of the godly. But in M. Hardinges Masse there is neither Communion, nor any other consolation at all: but onely a number of light and bare gestures, and Ceremonies, farre vnméete for so graue a purpose. But what shoulde mooue this man, thus scornefully to ieast at the holy Ministration,1 and to cal Christes ordinance A bare Communion? Others cal it the Mystical Supper: others the holy Distribution: bare, or naked, no man I trowe, durste euer to cal it, but M. Hardinge. One of his owne Doctours comparinge Consecration,2 and Communion togeather, saithe thus: Communio sacra maior est in effectu sanctitatis, quam Consecratio. The holy Communion in effecte of Holinesse, is more then Consecration. And againe, Consecratio est propter Communionem. Ergo,