A04474:2693
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 10 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 10 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Besides all this, M. Harding is fain to falsify Cyrillus, his own Doctor, and to allege his words otherwise, then he found them. For, where as in the common Latin Translation it is written thus, Sciens, panem hunc, qui videtur à nobis, non esse Panem, etiamsi gustus Panem esse sentiat: Knowing, that this Bread, that is seen of us, is no Bread, all be it our taste do perceive it to be Bread: M. Harding hath chosen rather to turn it thus: Cum scias, qui videtur esse Panis, non esse, sed Corpus Christi: 1Knowing, that the thing, that seemeth to be Bread, is no Bread, but the Bod•e of Christ. Wherein he hath both skipped over one whole clause, and also corrupted the words, and meaning of his Author. For Cyrillus saith, With our outward eyes we see Bread. M. Harding saith, It appeareth, or seemeth only to be Bread. Cyrillus saith, Our taste perceiveth (or knoweth) it to be Bread: This clause M. Harding hath left out, both in his Latin Translation, and also in the English.
Bysides al this, M. Hardinge is faine to falsifie Cyrillus, his owne Doctoure, and to allege his woordes othe•wise, then he founde them. For, where as in the common Latine Translation it is writen thus, Sciens, panem hunc, qui videtur à nobis, non esse Panem, etiamsi gustus Panem esse sentiat: Knowinge, that this Breade, that is seene of vs, is no Breade, al be it our taste doo perceiue it to be Breade: M. Hardinge hath chosen rather to turne it thus: Cum scias, qui videtur esse Panis, non esse, sed Corpus Christi: 1Knowinge, that the thing, that seemeth to be Breade, is no Breade, but the Bod•e of Christe. Wherein he hath bothe skipte ouer one whole clause, and also corrupted the woordes, and meaninge of his Authour. For Cyrillus saith, With our outwarde eies wee see Breade. M. Hardinge saith, It appeareth, or seemeth onely to be Breade. Cyrillus saith, Our tast perceiueth (or knoweth) it to be Breade: This clause M. Hardinge hath leaft out, both in his Latine Translation, and also in the Englishe.
- 1M. Harding of purpose falsifieth and corrupteth the Old Fathers.