A04474:2807
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 12 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 12 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The B. of Salisbury.
The B. of Sarisburie.
Here hath M. Harding found out a new kind of Figures, far differing from all the rest. The Breaking of the Accidents, saith he, is a token of the Breaking of Christs Body: and this he thinketh him self well able to prove by certain words of S. Augustine. Wherein notwithstanding he find but ⟨p. 454⟩small help in the text, (for S. Augustine maketh no manner mention, neither of any Real, or Fleshly Presence, nor of Breaking of Forms, or Accidents) yet is he somewhat relived by the Gloss.1 For the words thereof are these, Secundum hoc dices, Ipsa Accidentia frangi, & dare sonitum: According to this thou shalt say, that the very Accidents, and Shows are Broken, and give a Crack. Thus we see, there is no inconvenience so great, but these men can well defend it.
Here hath M. Hardinge founde out a newe kinde of Figures, farre differinge from al the rest. The Breakinge of the Accidentes, saith he, is a token of the Breakinge of Christes Bodie: and this he thinketh him self wel hable to prooue by certaine woordes of S. Augustine. Wherein notwithstandinge he finde but ⟨p. 454⟩smal helpe in the texte, (for S. Augustine maketh no manner mention, neither of any Real, or Fleashly Presence, nor of Breakinge of Formes, or Accidentes) yet is he somewhat reliued by the Glose.1 For the woordes thereof are these, Secundum hoc dices, Ipsa Accidentia frangi, & dare sonitum: Accordinge to this thou shalt say, that the very Accidentes, and Shewes are Broken, and geue a Cracke. Thus wee see, there is no inconuenience so greate, but these men can wel defende it.