A04474:2820
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 12 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 12 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But Christ gave unto his Disciples a Figure of his Body:
But Christe gaue vnto his Disciples a Figure of his Bodie:
Therefore, it must needs follow, that Christ had a very Natural Body.
Therefore, it muste néedes folowe, that Christe had a very Natural Bodie.
As every part of this Argument is true, so the proportion, and form of the same importeth a necessary sequel in reason. The words stand thus, Acceptum Panem, 1& distributum Discipulis, Corpus suum illum fecit, Dicendo, Hoc est Corpus meum, id est, Figura Corporis mei. Figura autem non esset, nisi Veritatis esset Corpus. Coeterum vacua res, quae est Phantasma, Figuram capere non potest. Christe taking the •reade, and distributing it to his Disciples, made it his Body, sa•einge, This is my Body: That is to say, This is a Figure of my Body. But a Figure it could not be, onlesse there were a Body of a trueth, and in deed. For a void thing, as is a fantasy, can receive no Figure. These words are plain of them self: and if trueth only might suffice, would require no long Exposition.
As euery parte of this Argument is true, so the proportion, and forme of the same importeth a necessary sequele in reason. The woordes stande thus, Acceptum Panem, 1& distributum Discipulis, Corpus suum illum fecit, Dicendo, Hoc est Corpus meum, id est, Figura Corporis mei. Figura autem non esset, nisi Veritatis esset Corpus. Coeterum vacua res, quae est Phantasma, Figuram capere non potest. Christe takinge the reade, and distributinge it to his Disciples, made it his Bodie, saeinge, This is my Bodie: That is to saye, This is a Figure of my Bodie. But a Figure it coulde not be, onlesse there were a Bodie of a truethe, and in deede. For a voyde thinge, as is a fantasie, can receiue no Figure. These woordes are plaine of them selfe: and if truethe onely might suffice, woulde require no longe Exposition.