A04474:3884
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 23 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 23 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Notwithstanding his Resolution is this: Sanè dici potest, quòd Corpus Christi à brutis animalibus non sumitur: It may very well be said, that a brute beast receiveth not the Body of Christ. But this Sentence is reversed, and not thought Catholic. For the great Faculty of Paris hath given this judgement upon the same, Hic Magister non tenetur: Herein the Master is not allowed.
Notwithstandinge his Resolution is this: Sanè dici potest, quòd Corpus Christi à brutis animalibus non sumitur: It maie very wel be saide, that a brute beaste receiueth not the Bodie of Christe. But this Sentence is reuersed, and not thought Catholique. For the greate Facultie of Parise hath geuen this iudgemente vpon the same, Hic Magister non tenetur: Herein the Maister is not allowed.
Therefore, notwithstanding M. Hardinges contrary determination, this Doctrine hitherto appeareth right good, and Catholic.
Therefore, notwithstandinge M. Hardinges contrary determination, this Doctrine hitherto appeareth right good, and Catholique.
Touching such cases, as herein may happen, Antoninus the Archbishop of Florence writeth thus: 1Si Mus, aut aliud animal, &c. If a Mouse, or any other worm, or beast happen to eat the Sacrament through negligence of keeping, let the keeper, through whose negligence it happened, be enjoined to penance forty days. And if it be possible, let the Mouse be taken, and burnt, and let his ashes be buried in, or about the Altar. But Peter of Palus saith, The Mouses entrails must be drawn: and the Portion of the Sacrament, that there remaineth, if the Priest be squeamish to receive it, must reverently be said up in the Tabernacle, until it may naturally be consumed. But the Host so found in the