A04474:3915
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 24 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 24 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The B. of Salisbury.
The B. of Sarisburie.
In this Article M. Harding only uttereth some part of his choler against them, whom it pleaseth him to call Ge•evians: and vaunteth much his own learning, as learned men, seldom use to do, with reproach, and disdain of others: and in the end, touching the matter, saith utterly nothing. Yet is there not lightly any doubt, that amaseth, & troubleth the best learned of his side, so much, as this.
In this Article M. Hardinge onely vttereth some parte of his choler againste them, whom it pleaseth him to cal Ge•euians: and vaunteth muche his owne learning, as learned men, seldome vse to doo, with reproche, and disdaine of others: and in the ende, touchinge the mater, saithe vtterly nothinge. Yet is there not lightly any doubte, that amaseth, & troubleth the best learned of his side, so muche, as this.
For, their fantasy of Transubstantiation presupposed to stand in force, if they say, That Christ by this Pronoun, Hoc, meante the Bread, that he held in his hand, Then must it needs follow, that the very Substance of that Bread, was the very Body of Christ. For by this position, that must needs be the purport, and meaning of these words.
For, their fantasie of Transubstantiation presupposed to stande in force, if they say, That Christe by this Pronowne, Hoc, meante the Breade, that he helde in his hande, Then must it needes folow, that the very Substance of that Breade, was the very Bodie of Christe. For by this position, that must néedes be the purporte, and meaninge of these woordes.