A04474:662
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 1 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 1 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But, Eubulus is witness of these things. He peered in at the crevice, and espied what was done. Certainly a meet witness for such a matter. I have heard sometime a man without a name: but here we have found a name without a man. M. Hardinges Amphilochius ever maketh this Eubulus the chiefest man about S. Basil in all his affairs: Yet neither doth Basil in any of all his Epistles, or other works, nor Nazianzene, nor Socrates, nor Sozomenus, nor Gregorius Nyssenus, nor Gregorius Presbyter, once make mention of any such. Thus much for the credit of M. Hardinges Amphilochius.
But, Eubulus is witnesse of these thinges. He peered in at the creauie, and espied what was donne. Certainely a méete witnesse for suche a mater. I haue hearde sometime a man without a name: but here we haue founde a name without a man. M. Hardinges Amphilochius euer maketh this Eubulus the chiefest man aboute S. Basile in al his affaires: Yet neither doothe Basile in any of al his Epistles, or other woorkes, nor Nazianzene, nor Socrates, nor Sozomenus, nor Gregorius Nyssenus, nor Gregorius Presbyter, once make mention of any suche. Thus muche for the credite of M. Hardinges Amphilochius.
But if all this were good record, and matter of trueth, yet were it but a miracle, but a vision, and perhaps but a dream, but one mans fac•e, but once done, not in the day time, but at midnight, and that without company, and without witness. If this Eubulus, which doubtless was No Body, had not espied it, No Body should ever have heard of it.
But if al this were good recorde, and mater of trueth, yet were it but a miracle, but a vision, and perhaps but a dreame, but one mans fac•e, but once donne, not in the day time, but at midnight, and that without companie, and without witnesse. If this Eubulus, whiche doubtelesse was No Bodie, had not espied it, No Bodie shoulde euer haue hearde of it.