A04474:901
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 2 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 2 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
And whereas M. Harding allegeth S. Augustine to the contrary, if he had considered the words of one William Wideforde, 1a Doctor of his own side, which he useth against Wycliffe, I reckon, either he would have better advised him self, or else would have refused his own Doctor. Wildefordes words be these: Hic dico, quod non habetur ex textu, vel ex Glosa Lucae. 24. vel per antiquos Doctores, quod ille Panis, quem Christus fregit post Resurrectionem, fuit Consecratus, vel Sacramentalis. Ideo ineptè, & consequenter dico, quod falsò allegat authoritatē Augustini. This I say, it cannot be gathered neither by the text of S. Luke, nor by the Gloss, nor by the ancient Doctors, that the Bread that Christ brake after his Resurrection, was the Consecrate, or Sacramental Bread. And therefore (I say) that foolishly, and by consequence, that falsely he allegeth S. Augustine to this purpose.
And whereas M. Hardinge allegeth S. Augustine to the contrary, if he had considered the woordes of one William Wideforde, 1a Doctour of his owne side, whiche he vseth against Wicklife, I recken, either he woulde haue better aduised him selfe, or els woulde haue refused his owne Doctour. Wildefordes woordes be these: Hic dico, quod non habetur ex textu, vel ex Glosa Lucae. 24. vel per antiquos Doctores, quod ille Panis, quem Christus fregit post Resurrectionem, fuit Consecratus, vel Sacramentalis. Ideo ineptè, & consequenter dico, quod falsò allegat authoritatē Augustini. This I say, it cannot be geathered neither by the texte of S. Luke, nor by the Glose, nor by the auncient Doctours, that the Breade that Christe brake after his Resurrection, was the Consecrate, or Sacramental Bread. And therefore (I say) that foolishely, and by consequence, that falsely he allegeth S. Augustine to this purpose.
- 1VVil. Wideford. contra Wi•levum.VVil. VVideford. contra VVi•leuum.