A05143:390
Twenty-seven Sermons
27 sermons preached by the right Reverend father in God and constant martyr [sic] of Jesus Christ, Master Hugh Latimer, as well such as in times past have been printed, as certain other coming to our hands of late, which were yet never set forth in print. Faithfully perused [and] allowed according to the order appointed in the Queens Majesties injunctions. 1. Hys sermon Ad clerum. 2. Hys fourth sermon upon the plough. 3. His. 7. sermons before king Edward. 4 His sermon at Stamford. 5. His last sermon before king Edward. 6. His. 7. sermons upon the Lords prayer. 7. His other. 9. sermons upon certain Gospels and Epistles27 sermons preached by the ryght Reuerende father in God and constant matir [sic] of Iesus Christe, Maister Hugh Latimer, as well such as in tymes past haue bene printed, as certayne other commyng to our handes of late, whych were yet neuer set forth in print. Faithfully perused [and] allowed accordying to the order appoynted in the Quenes Maiesties iniunctions. 1. Hys sermon Ad clerum. 2. Hys fourth sermon vpon the plough. 3. Hys. 7. sermons before kyng Edward. 4 Hys sermon at Stamforde. 5. Hys last sermon before kyng Edward. 6. Hys. 7. sermons vpon the Lordes prayer. 7. Hys other. 9. sermons vpon certayne Gospels and Epistles
London: printed by John Day, 1562London: printed by Iohn Day, 1562
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
I will ask here a great clerkly question, where was the1 soul now after it went out of this young maid? it was not in heaven nor in hell, nam in inferno non est redemptio, there is no redemption in hell, where was it then? in purgatory? so the papists have reasoned, it was not in hell nor in heaven, ergo it was in purgatory: which no doubt is a vain foolish argument. Now I will make a clerkly answer unto my […]: & such an answer that if yt bishop of Rome would have2 gone no further, we should have been well enough: there would not have been such errors & fooleries in religion, as there hath ben. Now my answer is this, I can not tell but where it pleased god it should be, there it was. Is this not a good answer to such a clerkly […]? I think it be, other answer no body gets ⟨p. 107⟩at me: because scripture telleth me not where she was.
I wyll aske here a great clearkly question, where was the1 soule now after it went oute of this yong mayde? it was not in heauen nor in hel, nam in inferno non est redemptio, there is no redemption in hell, where was it then? in purgatorye? so the papistes haue reasoned, it was not in hell nor in heanen, ergo it was in purgatory: which no doute is a vaine folish argumēt. Now I wil make a clearkely answer vnto my 〈…〉: & such an answer that if yt bishop of Rome woldhaue2 gone no further, we shold haue bene wel enough: there wold not haue bene such errors & fooleries in religiō, as there hath ben. Now my answer is this, I cā not telbut where it plesed god it shold be, ther it was. Is this not a good answer to such a clerakly 〈…〉? I think it be, other answer no body gettes ⟨p. 107⟩at me: because scripture telleth me not where she was.
- 1