A06504:232
An exposition of Solomons book called Ecclesiastes or the preacher. Seen and allowedAn exposition of Salomons booke called Ecclesiastes or the preacher. Seene and allowed
An exposition of Solomons book called Ecclesiastes or the preacher. Seen and allowed.An exposition of Salomons booke called Ecclesiastes or the preacher. Seene and allowed.
London: printed by John Daye, 1573London: printed by Iohn Daye, 1573
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
¶Therefore I see that there is nothing better, then that a man should rejoice in his affairs, because that is his portion. For who shall bring him to see, what shall be after him?
¶Therefore I see that there is nothing better, then that a mā should reioyse in his affaires, because that is his portion. For who shall bryng him to see, what shall be after him?
1This is the opinion of those that be godly, for they have taken hold of this doctrine. The ungodly are vexed with the likeness and similitude between us and beasts, and can find nothing but vanity in their travels. For this doctrine they neither know, nor believe, for reason can not persuade it them. And by this place is all the whole heap of Philosophers ⟨p. 62⟩convinced, gathering many things together touching the immortality of the soul, which they believe not. This therefore is the portion of the godly, to enjoy the things present, and not to be troubled with things to come. But this cometh not to pass under the sun. They that do otherwise clog them selves with double incommodity, they enjoy not the things present, nor attain not to the things to come, and it happeneth unto them as unto Aesopes dog, that snatched at the shadow, & lost his meat. So these men loth the things present, and seek for other things. Thus hitherto Solomon hath discoursed most in generalities of the vanities of this world: now follow certain particulars.
1THis is the opinion of those that be godly, for they haue taken holde of this doctrine. The vngodly are vexed with the likenes and similitude betwene vs and beastes, and can finde nothing but vanity in their trauels. For this doctrine they neither know, nor beleeue, for reason can not persuade it them. And by this place is all the whole heape of Philosophers