A10233:29
Two very learned sermons of M. Beza, together with a short sum of the…Two very lerned sermons of M. Beza, togither with a short sum of the…
Two very learned sermons of M. Beza, together with a short sum of the sacrament of the Lords Supper: Whereunto is added a treatise of the substance of the Lords Supper, wherein is briefly and soundly discussed the p[r]incipall points in controversy, concerning that question. By T.W.Two very lerned sermons of M. Beza, togither with a short sum of the sacrament of the Lordes Supper: Wherevnto is added a treatise of the substance of the Lords Supper, wherin is breflie and soundlie discussed the p[r]incipall points in controuersie, concerning that question. By T.W.
London: printed by Robert Walde-grave for T. Man, 1588London: printed by Robert Walde-graue for T. Man, 1588
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Jacobus Andreas in those his Thesis or propositions, by which he blowed to the field, or bade the battle, wrote the same even in so many words, as you would say, to wit, that the habitation or dwelling of ⟨p. 22⟩the son of God in Christ is not otherwise to be considered than in all other creatures whatsoever, as in respect of his essential habitation or dwelling, for God is every where. If a man demand what shall be the difference of the personal union: this shall be their answer, that it consisteth herein, that into all other things the godhead hath poured forth some properties or qualities, but into Christs humanity or manhood he hath poured all properties. A wonderful thing, that after that these opinions have now a long while since bin tossed, and by the solemn and most just judgements of Christs church, condemned and confounded by so many darts, as have come from heaven it self, against the authors and fautors of these ungodly blasphemies, a marvellous thing, I say, that there should now spring up some, as dare be bold, both by word and writing, to maintain and defend the same, and that with so great rejoicing and commendation of most unskilful men: for who is he unless he be altogether blind, that seeth not, that if the word be no other wise present in christ, than in many things, (that is to say, beingly, presently, powerfully ⟨p. 23⟩as in schools they were wont to say) that then Christs person is destroyed,1 as Nestorius taught? And that if we grant an effusion or pouring forth of all the proprieties of the godhead into the flesh assumed or taken, that then the other part of the ungodly assertion of Eutyches, 2shall be erected and set up? A wonderful wound indeed flowing from such divers matters, to wit, the separating of the natures on the one side, & the effusion or pouring forth of the properties of the one nature into the other, on the other side, & first in our memory & time most impudently fried, and most unskilfully by our ubiquitaries defended.
Iacobus Andreas in those his Thesis or propositions, by which he blowed to the field, or bade the battel, wrote the same euen in so many words, as you would saie, to wit, that the habitation or dwelling of