A10233:42
Two very learned sermons of M. Beza, together with a short sum of the…Two very lerned sermons of M. Beza, togither with a short sum of the…
Two very learned sermons of M. Beza, together with a short sum of the sacrament of the Lords Supper: Whereunto is added a treatise of the substance of the Lords Supper, wherein is briefly and soundly discussed the p[r]incipall points in controversy, concerning that question. By T.W.Two very lerned sermons of M. Beza, togither with a short sum of the sacrament of the Lordes Supper: Wherevnto is added a treatise of the substance of the Lords Supper, wherin is breflie and soundlie discussed the p[r]incipall points in controuersie, concerning that question. By T.W.
London: printed by Robert Walde-grave for T. Man, 1588London: printed by Robert Walde-graue for T. Man, 1588
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
and again, such things as are proper to man, are spoken, and that rightly of God, but never, or at no hand of the godhead. The reason is, because that the subsistence or being is denominated even in the concrete of one of the natures only. So by the Son of GOD, we do many times understand,1 not only the godhead of the Son by it self, but Christ manifested in the flesh. And by the GOD of glory we mean GOD become or made man: and like wise by son of man, we mean man assumed or taken of the eternal son of God.
and againe, suche things as are proper to man, are spoken, and that rightlie of God, but neuer, or at no hand of the godhead. The reason is, because that the subsistence or being is denominated euen in the concret of one of the natures onelie. So by the Sonne of GOD, wee doo many times vnderstand,1 not onely the godhead of the sonne by it selfe, but Christ manifested in the fleshe. And by the GOD of glorie wee meane GOD become or made man: and like wise by sonne of man, we meane man assumed or taken of the eternall son of God.
Whereby it cometh to pass, that by reason of that personal union, some things in the concrete, may be said of the whole person, which yet notwithstanding in the abstract,1 do agree to one of the natures only. So Saint Paul affirmeth, that the GOD of glory was crucified, which proposition ⟨p. 44⟩is not true touching whole Christ,