A10250:494
Propositions and principles of divinity propounded and disputed in the university of GenevaPropositions and principles of diuinitie propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua
Propositions and principles of divinity propounded and disputed in the university of Geneva, by certain students of divinity there, under M. Theod. Beza, and M. Anthony Faius ... Wherein is contained a methodical summary, or epitome of the common places of divinity. Translated out of Latin into English, to the end that the causes, both of the present dangers of that Church, and also of the troubles of those that are hardly dealt with else-where, may appear in the English tongue.Propositions and principles of diuinitie propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua, by certaine students of diuinitie there, vnder M. Theod. Beza, and M. Anthonie Faius ... Wherein is contained a methodicall summarie, or epitome of the common places of diuinitie. Translated out of Latine into English, to the end that the causes, both of the present dangers of that Church, and also of the troubles of those that are hardlie dealt vvith els-vvhere, may appeare in the English tongue.
Edinburgh: printed by Robert Waldegrave, 1591Edinburgh: printed by Robert Waldegraue, 1591
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
11 We grant then, that there is another manifold lawful use of Pictures: for some of them were Typical, in the old Testament; yet not by man, but by Gods appointment, and not to the end, that any wise they should be worshipped, but that they might represent some divine thing, under the shape of that which was visible unto the eye, as the brazen Serpent was the figure of Christ, and the shape of the two Cherubins, that sat upon the holy Ark, resembled the Majesty of God, attended upon by his Angels.
11 We grant then, that there is another manifold lawfull vse of Pictures: for some of them were Typicall, in the old Testament; yet not by man, but by Gods appointment, and not to the end, that any wise they should bee worshipped, but that they might represent some diuine thing, vnder the shape of that which was visible vnto the eie, as the brasen Serpent was the figure of Christ, and the shape of the two Cherubins, that sat vpon the holy Arke, resembled the Majestie of God, attended vpon by his Angels.
12 These examples do nothing avail them, who by this pretence do defend, that Images may be tolerated in the Churches of Christians; For the figure of the Serpent, was not placed in the Tabernacle, neither was it made to the end it should be preserved; much less, that it should be any wise worshipped, and it was afterward justly broken in pieces; and the Cherubins, together with the Ark it self were so placed, as they were not be seen by those that came into the Tabernacle.
12 These examples doe nothing auaile them, who by this pretence doe defend, that Images may be tolerated in the Churches of Christians; For the figure of the Serppēt, was not placed in the Tabernacle, neither was it made to the end it should be preserued; much lesse, that it should be anie wise worshipped, and it was afterward justlie broken in peeces; and the Cherubins, together with the Ark it selfe were so placed, as they were not be seen by those that came into the Tabernacle.