A10345:838
The sum of the conference between John Rainoldes and John Hart touching the head…The summe of the conference betwene Iohn Rainoldes and Iohn Hart touching the head…
The sum of the conference between John Rainoldes and John Hart touching the head and the faith of the Church. Wherein by the way are handled sundry points, of the sufficiency and right expounding of the Scriptures, the ministry of the Church, the function of priesthood, the sacrifice of the mass, with other controversies of religion: but chiefly and purposely the point of Church-government ... Penned by John Rainoldes, according to the notes set down in writing by them both: perused by John Hart, and (after things supplied, & altered, as he thought good) allowed for the faithful report of that which past in conference between them. Whereunto is annexed a treatise entitled, Six conclusions touching the Holy Scripture and the Church, written by John Rainoldes. With a defence of such things as Thomas Stapleton and Gregory Martin have carped at therein.The summe of the conference betwene Iohn Rainoldes and Iohn Hart touching the head and the faith of the Church. Wherein by the way are handled sundrie points, of the sufficiencie and right expounding of the Scriptures, the ministerie of the Church, the function of priesthood, the sacrifice of the masse, with other controuerises of religion: but chiefly and purposely the point of Church-gouernment ... Penned by Iohn Rainoldes, according to the notes set downe in writing by them both: perused by Iohn Hart, and (after things supplied, & altered, as he thought good) allowed for the faithfull report of that which past in conference betwene them. Whereunto is annexed a treatise intitled, Six conclusions touching the Holie Scripture and the Church, writen by Iohn Rainoldes. With a defence of such thinges as Thomas Stapleton and Gregorie Martin haue carped at therein.
Londini: printed by John Wolfe, 1584Londini: printed by Iohn Wolfe, 1584
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Hart. They show by good reasons that he is falsely slandered. For Pighius and Hosius do bring the testimonies of historians, Platina, Sabellicus, Nauclerus, Blondus, & Aeneas Siluius: who say, that Honorius did condemn the heresy of the Monothelites. Whereto Onuphrius addeth the authorities of Emmanuel Callêca, a Grecian; and John of Turrecremata, Cardinal of San-sisto: who have proved by their writings that he was a Catholic Bishop.
Hart. They shew by good reasons that he is falsely slaundered. For Pighius and Hosius doo bring the testimonies of historians, Platina, Sabellicus, Nauclerus, Blondus, & Aeneas Siluius: who say, that Honorius did condemne the heresie of the Monothelites. Whereto Onuphrius addeth the authorities of Emmanuell Callêca, a Grecian; and Iohn of Turrecremata, Cardinal of San-sisto: who haue proued by their writings that he was a Catholike Bishop.
Rainoldes. Have proved? Nay they would, had not their proofs failed. But is not this a strange answer? The question is touching Honorius, a Pope, who lived almost a thousand years ago, what he taught in a point of faith. The Bishops, who lived about the same time,