A14212:297
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zechariah…A collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary…
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Ans. 1. The proof of the Major faileth, because an universal affirmative should be concluded in Barbara.
Ans. 1. The proofe of the Maior faileth, because an vniuersal affirmatiue should be concluded in Barbara.
2 The Major beggeth that which is in controversy and is denied. The falseness thereof appeareth John the third, where CHRIST includeth in the same word of birth the spirit and the flesh: and yet it followeth not that they both are borne after the same manner, or by the same instrument.
2 The Maior beggeth that which is in controversie and is denyed. The falsenesse thereof appeareth Iohn the third, where CHRIST includeth in the same worde of birth the spirit and the flesh: and yet it followeth not that they both are borne after the same manner, or by the same instrument.
3 The Minor also is false. For this word of eating is referred to the hallowed bread, not to the body, but by way of consequence. For it properly pertaineth unto that, which the Lord took in his hands and brake, which was bread, and not his body. This reason is worthy the marking for that according to the Papists and such as simply maintain Consubstantiation the body of CHRIST is not there before the words of consecration (as they call them) are ⟨p. 165⟩pronounced, but beginneth to be there in the very last instant of the pronouncing of these words, This is my body. But according to the Ubiquitaries, which are as it were chemical consubstantiators, it is there indeed, as in any other bread, but it is not yet edible until after consecration. CHRIST then commanded not to eat that with our mouth in the bread, which as yet was not in the bread, or as yet was not edible.