A14212:299
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zechariah…A collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary…
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3 The Minor also is false. For this word of eating is referred to the hallowed bread, not to the body, but by way of consequence. For it properly pertaineth unto that, which the Lord took in his hands and brake, which was bread, and not his body. This reason is worthy the marking for that according to the Papists and such as simply maintain Consubstantiation the body of CHRIST is not there before the words of consecration (as they call them) are ⟨p. 165⟩pronounced, but beginneth to be there in the very last instant of the pronouncing of these words, This is my body. But according to the Ubiquitaries, which are as it were chemical consubstantiators, it is there indeed, as in any other bread, but it is not yet edible until after consecration. CHRIST then commanded not to eat that with our mouth in the bread, which as yet was not in the bread, or as yet was not edible.
3 The Minor also is false. For this worde of eating is referred to the hollyed breade, not to the bodie, but by way of consequence. For it properly pertaineth vnto that, which the Lord tooke in his handes and brake, which was bread, and not his body. This reason is vvorthy the marking for that according to the Papistes and such as simplie mainetaine Consubstantiation the bodie of CHRIST is not there before the wordes of consecration (as they call them) are ⟨p. 165⟩pronounced, but beginneth to bee there in the very last instante of the pronouncing of these wordes, This is my bodie. But according to the Vbiquitaries, which are as it were chymicall consubstantiators, it is there indeede, as in any other breade, but it is not yet edible vntill after consecration. CHRIST then commaunded not to eate that with our mouth in the breade, which as yet was not in the breade, or as yet was not edible.
Then again he proves the Major of his former syllogism.
Then againe he proues the Maior of his former syllogisme.