A14212:300
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Then again he proves the Major of his former syllogism.
Then againe he proues the Maior of his former syllogisme.
A word having but one signification is to be taken but in one. But eating both of the bread and of the body of Christ hath but one signification, viz. with the mouth. It is then to be taken in one signification of both.
A word having but one signification is to be taken but in one. But eating both of the breade and of the body of Christ hath but one signification, viz. with the mouth. It is then to bee taken in one signification of both.
Ans. 1. Here again faileth the proof of the Major, being an universal affirmative, which should have bin concluded in Barbara.
Ans. 1. Heere againe faileth the proofe of the Maior, being an vniversall affirmatiue, which should haue bin concluded in Barbara.
2 The Minor is a begging of that which is in controversy.
2 The Minor is a begging of that which is in cō troversie.
Hereunto is there made answer in two ⟨p. 166⟩Propositions, both being affirmative.
Heereunto is there made aunswere in tvvo ⟨p. 166⟩Propositions, both being affirmatiue.
The things signified are received by the faithful alone 1 Reason. Because only they that believe receive the promises by faith.
The things signified are receiued by the faithful alōe 1 Reason. Because only they that beleeue receiue the promises by faith.
2 Reason. Because they alone that believe have the spirit of Christ, from the which his life-giving flesh cannot be separated.
2 Reason. Because they alone that beleeue haue the spirit of Christ, from the which his life-giuing fleshe cannot be separated.
4 Reason. Because they alone that believe receive and have life. Joh 3 & 6.
4 Reason. Because they alone that beleeue receiue and haue life. Ioh 3 & 6.
The ungodly coming without faith receive the signs without the things themselves.
The vngodly comming without faith receiue the signes without the things themselues.
Look the reasons as they are set down in the Church pag 58•.
Looke the reasons as they are set downe in the Church pag 58•.
Look the objections for the eating of the ungodly, Ibid. pag. 5•2.
Looke the obiections for the eating of the vngod•y, Ibid. pag. 5•2.
