A15057:308
An answer to the Ten reasons of Edmund Campian the Jesuit in confidence whereof he offered disputation to the ministers of the Church of England, in the controversy of faith. Whereunto is added in brief marginal notes, the sum of the defence of those reasons by John Duræus the Scot, being a priest and a Jesuit, with a reply unto it. Written first in the Latin tongue by the reverend and faithful servant of Christ and his Church, William Whitakers, Doctor in Divinity, and the Kings Professor and public reader of Divinity in the University of Cambridge. And now faithfully translated for the benefit of the unlearned (at the appointment and desire of some in authority) into the English tongue; by Richard Stock, preacher in London. ...An ansvvere to the Ten reasons of Edmund Campian the Iesuit in confidence wherof he offered disputation to the ministers of the Church of England, in the controuersie of faith. Whereunto is added in briefe marginall notes, the summe of the defence of those reasons by Iohn Duræus the Scot, being a priest and a Iesuit, with a reply vnto it. Written first in the Latine tongue by the reuerend and faithfull seruant of Christ and his Church, William Whitakers, Doctor in Diuinitie, and the Kings Professor and publike reader of Diuinitie in the Vniuersitie of Cambridge. And now faithfully translated for the benefit of the vnlearned (at the appointment and desire of some in authoritie) into the English tongue; by Richard Stocke, preacher in London. ...
London: printed by Felix Kyngston for Cuthbert Burby and Edmund Weaver, 1606London: printed by Felix Kyngston for Cuthbert Burby and Edmund Weauer, 1606
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The third head,1 or kind of deceitful disputation which you say we usually err in, is Homonymia, equivocation, or a mistaking the sense of words: whereof you propound two examples: For (say you) we both confound the order of Priests, because S. John hath termed us all Priests; and also abolish choice of meats, and prescribed observation of days, 2because the Prophet highly commendeth a spiritual fast. 3I will speak a few words both of the one and other, that I may clearly quit us of this crime of Homonymy. Saint John alone hath not named allp Christians Priests,5 but S. Peter also hath termed them a holy, and a royal Priesthood: and this name is in no place of the new Testamentq properly applied to the Ministers of the Gospel. For Christ being made an high Priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek, hath no copartners ⟨p. 280⟩of thisr Priesthood: therefore Christ hath left unto his (Churches) a Ministry, and not a new Priesthood. Neither doth there remain to uss any such sacrifice; for the administration whereof some special Priests must needs be authorised. For that sacrifice of praise, and doing good, 9which the Apostle mentioneth, and which now remaineth only; that (I say) appertaineth indifferently to all Christians. Notwithstanding we permit none to execute the administration of this ministry, which Christ would have to be perpetual in his Church, but them whom it concerneth, and who are by due ordert called thereunto. Albeit then Christ have made us all both Kings, that we might be able to subdue our sins; and Priests, that we might offer him spiritual sacrifices: ⟨p. 281⟩notwithstanding as it is not lawful for every man to dream of a kingdom, so it is a thing detestable for any man to enter upon the holy Ministry, who hath not that function committed unto him by divine authority. Wherefore I see not at all why you should charge us with any such Homonymy (or falsehood from ambiguous signification) in this word. As for your manner of fasting, that indeed is wholly in show, and hath nothing in it of a Christian fast, but the very name. For to make choice of meats, as a thing more religious, and to prescribe certain, and perpetual set days, wherein we must necessarily fast, theu one is witless, the other superstitious.
The third head,1 or kinde of deceitfull disputation which you say we vsually erre in, is Homonymia, equiuocation, or a mistaking the sense of words: whereof you propound two examples: For (say you) we both confound the order of Priests, because S. Iohn hath tearmed vs all Priests; and also abolish choice of meates, and prescribed obseruation of daies, 2because the Prophet highly commendeth a spirituall fast. 3I wil speake a few words both of the one and other, that I may cleerly quit vs of this crime of Homonymie. Saint Iohn alone hath not named allp Christians Priests,5 but S. Peter also hath tearmed them a holy, and a royall Priesthood: and this name is in no place of the new Testamentq properly applied to the Ministers of the Gospell. For Christ being made an high Priest for euer after the order of Melchisedech, hath no copartners ⟨p. 280⟩of thisr Priesthood: therefore Christ hath left vnto his (Churches) a Ministerie, and not a new Priesthood. Neither doth there remaine to vss any such sacrifice; for the administration whereof some speciall Priests must needs be authorised. For that sacrifice of praise, and doing good, 9which the Apostle mentioneth, and which now remaineth onely; that (I say) appertaineth indifferently to all Christians. Notwithstanding we permit none to execute the administration of this ministery, which Christ would haue to be perpetuall in his Church, but them whom it concerneth, and who are by due ordert called thereunto. Albeit then Christ haue made vs all both Kings, that we might be able to subdue our sinnes; and Priests, that we might offer him spirituall sacrifices: ⟨p. 281⟩
For what man, which is not deprived of judgement and all sense, will think that he fasteth, who (so that he abstainx from flesh) may at his pleasure glut himself with all manner of dainties? Or who can suppose that the Fridays fast is holier then the Wednesdays fast, but he must too much savour of ⟨p. 282⟩Judaism? If S. Paul reproved the Galatians,2 because they did observe days, and ymonths, and times, is it likely he would endure our Papists, which err more grossly and shamefully? If he forewarned the Colossians, that they would not be entangled with their superstition,4 which thought that some certain meats were not to bez touched, not to be tasted, not to be handled, would he allow the papistical choice of meats? If he determined long since,6 that it was devilish anda hypocritical to abstain from certain meats, if he were now living, would he change his doctrine, and command this abstinence to a Christian? We truly for our parts do always and very highly commend a true fast, whether it be private or public; neither do we commend them only, but also we use them, as this year last past may most plentifully witness for us, during which, public fasts were most religiously observed in very many places. As for those fasts of Moses, and David, & Elijah, and John Baptist, and the Apostles, wherein were they any whit like unto yours? for if fasting do consist in choice of meats, and in appointing set days, as you resolutely judge it doth, inform me ⟨p. 283⟩(if you can) that they either at any timeb
You haste forward and join unto these a fourth manner of deceitful disputation,1 named Circulation, which is, when one after a few words to no purpose returneth again to the same, and beggeth the question. I acknowledge it to be a gross, and unsavoury kind of sophistry so to do, but show me an example of our so doing. You propound one example, namely, about the true notes of the Church, for here, you say, we always make circuits and rounds, and use that very same thing for an argument, wherein the question lieth. But how prove you that? forsooth because we say the notes of the Church be, the word of God, and the Sacraments. And so we say truly, for they who have these, have a Church of Christ; but they who altogether want these, are utterly without both the Church and ⟨p. 284⟩Christ. Let us contend about these notes, that it may be discerned whether you or we have them. Tell me, in what Court shall we try this title? before what Commissioner, before what Judge shall we commence our plea? I suppose the word of God must be consulted with. But you say you have already consulted with it, and you now favour our cause less then you did before. But I say, Campian, we rest upon the word of God, and not on your judgement. Yea but (say you) prove unto me that this is the word of God: nay it were more meet that you should prove it is not. And I also require of you, that you will do the same thing which you command me to do, namely, that you will prove your word and Sacraments to be the very same, which Christ hath commended unto his Church. Wherefore this is no more our fault, then yours; the controversy is about the word of God. You contend that you have it; I contrariwise defend that we have it: if you like not my judgement, why may not I dislike yours? But you say, we expound the word camiss: I again avouch that it is false which you say. Whither are you now come at last? go one foot further forward if you can. Why, say you, I have the testimony of fifteen hundred years. This is nought else but a frivolous, a foolish, and an insolent brag. You have not, I say, you have not Campian. You are ever here deceived, and turn round again, as it were into a circle, and are faulty in that same very thing, for which you reprove ⟨p. 285⟩us. Touching the Fathers, I have answered you already. In the questions of greatest weight, they are wholly on our
in those of smaller moment, their judgements are divers, and they make for you in very few, and those of least importance. How much better would it stand with wisdom, that (as Augustine sometime wrote of Councils) neither you should object Jerome against me, nor I Augustine against you,1 thereby to prejudice each side, but that matter might be tried with matter, cause with cause, and reason with reason, by the authority of the Scriptures? 2For indeed, as the same Augustine hath elsewhere taught us, we must not have any mens disputations (howsoever otherwise they be men of sound judgement and worthy praise) in like estimation as the eCanonical Scriptures. Such an understander (saith he) am I in reading other mens writings, such would I have other men to be of mine. And because you have mentioned Thomas Aquinas, 4learn of him what manner arguments may be taken out of the Fathers writings. Divinity, or holy learning, saith he, useth authorities of Canonical Scripture to prove or disprove a thing necessarily; but it useth the authorities of other fDoctors of the Church to dispute of a thing probably.
in those of smaller moment, their iudgemēts are diuers, and they make for you in very few, and those of least importance. How much better would it stand with wisedome, that (as Augustine sometime wrote of Councels) neither you should obiect Ierome against me, nor I Augustine against you,1 thereby to preiudice each side, but that matter might be tried with matter, cause with cause, and reason with reason, by the authority of the Scriptures?
These, forsooth, ô you truly learned University students are those so notorious sophistical errors, which Campian could find worthy his censure in our mens writings: I could wish you might have this so famous a Sophister to canvas awhile at home in your Schools, then verily would it easily appear how much truth excelleth falsehood, and how far sound learning prevaileth against vain bragging words: for I know well such Sophisters as this is can neither any whit affright, nor greatly perplex you.
These, forsooth, ô you truly learned Vniuersitie students are those so notorious sophisticall errors, which Campian could finde worthie his censure in our mens writings: I could wish you might haue this so famons a Sophister to canuas awhile at home in your Schooles, then verily would it easily appeare how much truth excelleth falshood, and how farre sound learning preuaileth against vaine bragging words: for I know well such Sophisters as this is can neither any whit affright, nor greatly perplex you.
This shall be to you a direct path, so that the simplest that be, need not wander out of it. For who is,1 though he be but of the meaner sort of common people, so senseless (so that he have an eye unto his souls health) that cannot see, (if he look but a little about him) the path of the Church so plainly trodden, that cannot keep it, if he dislike of by-ways that lead him through brambles and ragged rocks, and places that cannot be passed? These things shall be well known even of those that be ignorant as Isaiah hath prophesied, and therefore most manifest unto ⟨p. 287⟩you. If you will,* let us take a view of all things that are any where to be seen: let us traverse over every thing wheresoever it be. All things do minister matter fit for our purpose. Let us ascend into heaven by imagination, there may we find such as through martyrdom,3 are as ruddy as the reda rose, and also such as for their innocency while they lived do glister as beautifully as the white Lilly. There may we see (I say) those* three and thirty Bishops ofb Rome, which for their faith were immediately murdered one after another. There may we see such Pastors as throughout all nations upon the earth shed their blood for the testimony of Christs name. There may we see the stock of faithful people that tread the steps of their Pastors. There may we see all thec saints of heaven that through their pure and virtuous conversation upon the earth, gave a rare example unto all sorts of men. Thou shalt find that they both lived here, and died members of our Catholic Church. And that we may take a taste of some few by named on our side was Ignatius, that so earnestly thirsted after martyrdom, who in ecclesiastical matters advanced a
Ireneus, no man yet attempted to deface as* foreign authority. Polycarpus hwas on our side that about the question of the keeping of Easter day, went and conferred with the sea of Rome, whose relics after he ⟨p. 288⟩was burned, the faithful Christians at Smyrna gathered together, and gave due honour unto their Bishop, by observing yearly the day of his death, as an high and solemn feast. On our side werei S. Cornelius, and S. Cyprian, those golden pair of Martyrs, which were both very worthy Prelates, but the former was the greater, who when he was Bishop of Rome, abolished the African errors. The latter also got great commendations through his loyal obedience which he showed to his superior, and dearest friend he had in the world. On our side was Sixtus, who when he song Mass at the Altar was solemnly served with seven men of the Clergy. On our side was S. Laurence, this mans Archdeacon, whom the adversaries cancel out of their Calendars. To whomk Prudentius, a man that had been Consul in Rome about 1200. years ago prayed in this wise: O most glorious servant of Christ, what power is given thee, and what authority is granted unto thee in heaven, the great joy of the Romans do sufficiently show upon the obtaining of such requests as they make unto thee. Amongst the which number, I beseech thee mercifully give ear to me thy rude Poet that doth confess unto thee my sinful thoughts, & also disclose my wicked actions, hear benignly, I pray thee, me thy humble suppliant Prudentius, that hath highly offended Christ my Saviour. On our sidel were those most blessed virgins, S. Cecilia, S. Agatha, S. Anastasia, S. Barbara, S. Agnes, S. Lucia, S. Dorothy, and S. Katherine, who constantly kept their vowed chastity against the tyranny both of men and devils. S. Helen was on our side, who was most famous for the finding of the cross of Christ. S. Monica the mother of S. Augustine was on our side, who when she lay on her death-bed most devoutly desired to be prayed for after her death,
Paula was on our side, who forsaking her fair palace situated within the city of Rome, and her goodly farms abroad in the ⟨p. 289⟩Country, went on pilgrimage by long journeys even unto to the cave of Bethlehem, where Christ lay crying in his cradle, there in solitariness to spend the residue of her time. On our side was S. Paulus, S. Hilarion, S. Antony, who lived in solitariness till they were old men. On our side was Satyrus, that was brother german unto S. Ambrose, who carrying about him in a stole that dreadful host, and being in present danger of shipwreck, hoping assuredly that he would protect him, leapt into the raging sea and s•ome to land. On our side were S. Nicholas and S. Martin, who were both Bishops much exercised in watchings, clothed altogether in hair-cloth, and fed with fasting. On our side was S. Benet, who was father unto a great number of Monks. Ten years were not long enough for me to recite this infinite number of Saints, neither do I here make mention of them, whom before I placed among the Doctors of the Church. I do not forget my promise, that I would pass over things as briefly as I could conveniently: let him that would know more hereof peruse not only the large histories of ancient writers, but also much more rather the grave authors, which have almost every one of them written special books of the lives of the Saints, for a remembrance to their posterity:* then let him tell me what his opinion is of those most ancient Christians,2 and most blessed, of whether religion were they, of the Catholics religion, or of the Lutherans religion?* I call to witness the throne of God, and that his tribunal seat, before which I shall stand to render an account of these my ten reasons, and of my said act in making my challenge, that either there is no heaven at all, which I and my adherents do detest, or that it belongeth properly to such only as are of our religion, which thing we for our parts hold for sound doctrine. Now on the contrary side, if you think good let us look down into hell,4 where lye some burning in everlasting fire. Who? the Jews: what Church are they against? ours. Who else? the heathen:
For what Church I pray you hath always withstood the gates of hell,1 but ours? When after the expulsion of the Jews under Vespasian, and Titus his son, Christians increased at Jerusalem, O immortal God what coming of good people was there to the holy places that were there! What wonderful devotion was there among all sorts of people to see that City of Jerusalem! What zeal to see Christs Sepulchre, what desire to see the manger wherein Christ lay, what thirsting after the sight of the cross whereon Christ was nailed, what longing to behold all sorts of monuments there, in which the holy Church taketh as much delight, as doth a spouse in the garments laid off by her husband! Upon this began that mortal hatred and implacable of the Jews against us; for even at this day they* complain, that our Ancestors were the cause of their Ancestors overthrow: as for Simon Magus, and the Lutherans,3 they received never a blow at their hands. Among the heathen there were many tyrants, who during their reign for the space of 300. years, by fits at divers times, invented most bitter torments against Christians. Against what manner of Christians I pray you?4 Truly against the Fathers of our faith and their Children. Mark well with your selves the speeches of this tyrant, that broiled S. Laurence on a Gridiron: It now well appears,5 that this is the order and fashion in your sacrifice. This doctrine you all agree to, that Bishops must offer up their sacrifice in plate of gold, and the people say, that the sacred blood smoketh out of your cups of silver, and that ye have tapers burning on golden candlesticks, during all the time of your night sacrifices. Also as common fame doth testify, your brethren have a special care to offer up thousands of pounds, though they sell their lands to get the same, ⟨p. 291⟩the lawful heir being thus disinherited and brought to beggary, though his holy parents greatly complaineth for such shameful sale of lands, as should by right descend to him from his grandfathers. This wealth lieth hid in some secret corners of your Churches, and you think it a great godly deed to make your sweet babes go naked: fetch out these treasures which thou hordest up by thy crafty persuasions, and wicked witchcraft, the which I say thou haddest in one dark hole or other:
the commonweal, the Kings Exchequer, and the common treasure have need thereof. That money being employed for soldiers wages, the general lieutenant may be fully fraughted with soldiers. I understand that this is an usual doctrine amongst you. Restore to every man his own, behold the Emperor acknowledgeth his own physiognomy stamped upon his own coin. Give to Caesar that which thou knowest to be Caesars. Truly I demand nothing but that which is just. Thy God (except I be deceived) cometh no money, neither brought he with him at his coming into the earth any golden guilders, but ministered his commandments by word of mouth, being purslesse himself. Perform faith fully that his doctrine which you openly preach abroad, restore your money willingly, content your self to be rich in words.* What manner of man seemeth this to be? against whom doth he thus rage? Whose Churches, sacrifices, lights, ceremonies, and ornaments hath he gone about to abolish? What Churches, golden goblets, and chalices of silver and costly gifts and rich stuff envied he at? This man undoubtedly doth hold on Luther's part.2 For what other colour have our mighty* Nimrods pretended to cover their theft withal, when they robbed 1441 0536 V 3 Gods houses, and made hanock of Christs inheritance? On the contrary part, what Church was it that Constantine the great, the very terror of Christs enemies, hath brought to quietness, even that self-same Church, over which the high […] Bishop Sylvester was governor,4 whom ⟨p. 292⟩the said Emperor called out of the mount Soract, where he lay secretly for fear of persecution, that by the help of the said Sylvester he might be* baptised with our Baptism: under what banner fought he, that he became so great a conqueror? even under the banner of then Cross: who was his mother, that he attained •o so great honour? even that blessed woman Saim Helen: what fathers took he part with? with the Fathers for sooth of the Nicene Council: what manner of men were they? namely they were S. Sylvester, S. Julius, S. Athanasius, S. Nicholas: to whose prayers did he commend himself? to the prayers of
It were too long to declare every matter in particular; but by these two Emperors, whereof the one was our deadly enemy, the other was our most faith full friend, one may easily conjecture of every other circumstance, which are like to these afore spoken of. For as under the Tyrant our Catholic Christians, had a trouble some increase, so under this Emperor through Gods great mercy, they were brought to a most happy end. Let us look a little into the Turks affairs:* Mahomet and Sergius the Monk, that fell from his religion, by howling in the deep pit of hell, oppressed both with their own sins, and the sins of their posterity. This monstrous and outrageous beast,2 I mean the Saracens and Turks, if they had not bin quailed and driven back heretofore by the orders of Knights, in our holy warfare and by the Princes and people that take our part: as for Luther, *to whom it is reported, that Solyman the great Turk, for this cause gave great thanks by his letters, yea and as for the Lutheran Princes, to whom the fortunate success of the Turks is but a laughing matter, as for them, I say, this •aging fury, and most mischievous to mortal men, had before this time destroyed and overthrown ⟨p. 293⟩all Europe, and would have occupied himself, as busily in pulling down of Altars and signs of Christs Cross, as ever Calvin was himself. Wherefore they are our peculiar enemies. Seeing that by our mens industry, hitherto, they have been kept back from off Christian mens throats.
It were too long to declare euery matter in particular; but by these two Emperors, wherof the one was our deadly enemie, the other was our most faith full friend, one may easilie coniecture of euery other circumstance, which are like to these afore spoken of. For as vnder the Tyrant our Catholike Christians, had a trouble some encrease, so vnder this Emperor through Gods great mercie, they were brought to a most happie end. Let vs looke a little into the Turkes affaires:* Mahomet and Sergius the Monke, that fell from his religion, by howling in the deepe pit of hell, oppressed both with their owne sinnes, and the sinnes of their posteritie. This monstrous and outragious beast,
Let us take a view of heretics,1 which are the very dregs and bellows, and fit food for hell fire. The first that cometh into my mind is Simon Magus: what did he?* he took from man freewill, he was still prating of faith only. The next that I remember was Novatian. What of him? he opposed himself to Cornelius the Pope of Rome. He was an enemy to the Sacraments of Penance, and holy Unction. Thirdly, I think of Manes the Persian, who taught that* Baptism was not a sufficient mean to work our salvation. After him there started up Aerius and Arian, who condemned prayers for the only, and was therefore forenamed the* Atheist as well as Lucian was. Then followed Vigilantius, which would not permit men to pray unto Saints, and Jovinian, who maintained marriage to be as excellent as virginity: Finally there came after all the whole rabble of heretics, as Macedonius, Pelagius, Nestorius, Eutyches, Monothelites, Image breakers, and others; to which number our posterity will add also Luther and Calvin: what of all these? Every one of them like carrion Crows, hatched all of one kind of egg, rebelled against the chief rulers of our Church, and by them were confounded and brought to naught. Let us now leave speaking of hell, to return to the earth again.5 Whither soever I shall cast mine eyes, and incline my cogitation, whether I behold the Patriarchs, and Seas Apostolic, or the Bishops of other countries, or renowned Princes and Emperors, or the first entrance of Christian religion, into every nation, or any monuments of antiquity, or the light of reason, or the ⟨p. 294⟩comely sight of honesty.6 I find that all of them do dutiful service, and speak favourably for our religion: witness hereof the Roman succession. In whose Church (that I may say as doth S. Augustine)*
Macarius and Cyril at Jerusalem, Proculus at Constantinople. Gregory & Basil at Cappadocia, Gregory surnamed Tha• maturgus in Pontus: Polycarpus at Smyrna: Justinus at Athens, Dionysius at Corinth. Another Gregory at Nyssa: Methodius at Tyre, Ephreenus in Syria, Cyprian, Optatus, Augustine in Africa. Epiphanius in Cyprus, Andrew in Crete, Ambrose, Paulinus, Gaudentius, Prosper, Faustus, Vigilius in Italy, I•encus, Martyrus, Hilarius, Eucherius, Gregory of Tours, and Siluianus in France, Vincentius, Orosins, Heldefonsus, Leander and Isidorus in Spain: Fugatius, Damanus, Justus Mellitus and Bede in England. Finally, lest I should seem ambitious in reckoning so many names, what treatises or fragments of treatises so ever be extant, of those as in the Primitive Church preached the Gospel, though in countries far asunder, yet all of them do deliver unto us, one and the self-same faith* which we Catholics do at this present profess; what cause (good Christ) could I allege, before thee for my example, but that thou mightest justly exclude me altogether from thy blessed company, if I should prefer a number of hedge-creepers, both few in account, and also unlearned, divided amongst themselves in opinions, & of a ⟨p. 295⟩••so lo•• before s••••y* light ••••pes of the Church? Witnesses also are all Pri•••s,3 Kings, Emperors and all their C••••-weals, the godliness of which Princes themselves,4 and also the people under their jurisdiction and their good government, both in times of peace and of mars, have at the first grounded themselves upon this sound rock of our Catholic doctrine. What famous men out of the East might I here recite unto you that bear the name of Theodosius? what worthy men out of the West, of the name of Charles? what Edwards out of England, what Lewises out of France, what Hermingildes out of Spain, what Henrys out of Saxony, what Winceslaes out of Bohemia, what Leopaldes out of Austria? What Stevens out of Hungary, what Josephats out of Indy? And finally what noble governors of many Empires, and Rulers of particular Countries, throughout the whole world, who by their good example, by their force, by their laws, by their continual care, by their charges, have maintained our Church? For so hath Isaiah prophesied,
Give ear, O Queen Elizabeth most mighty Princes, to your Majesty this great Prophet telleth this tale, he teacheth you precisely, what you have to do. And I tell you plain that one heaven cannot contain* Calvin and these Peers. Let your Majesty therefore take part with these honourable Princes, that you may show your self a condigne heir unto your noble ancestors, answerable unto your excellent wit, correspondent to your profound knowledge, worthy of high commendations, and finally fit for your royal dignity. Only this I endeavour as touching your Majesty, and will endeavour whatsoever become of me, against whom, as though I were your deadly enemy, these fellows do so often threaten hanging on the gallows: ô welcome sweet cross to me, ô welcome, I say, ten thousand times sweet cross of mine! the day will come (most sovereign Lady and Queen Elizabeth) even ⟨p. 296⟩that day I say will come, which shall •••dently s•t before your Majesties eyes whether of the two have more sincerely loved you, the* society of Jesuits or Luther's progeny.3 I go forward, there will witness with us all coasts and quarters of the world, wherein the evangelical trumpet hath been sounded ever since Christs nativity. Was this, think you, an easy matter to shut the mouths of idols, and to translate the kingdom of God unto the Gentiles. Luther speaketh of Christ, and we Catholics speak also of Christ. Is Christ then* divided?5 no surely, but either we preach a wrong Christ, or else he. How then shall we know who preacheth Christ aright? I will tell thee. Let him be true Christ, and on their side by whose bringing in Dagon's necks were broken.6 That Christ which is on our side was well content to use the service of men of our Church, when he expelled out of the harts of so many people, such a number of Jupiters, Mercuries, Dianes, Phebades, and an horrible dark rabble and lamentable hellishness wherewith many in former time were oppressed. I have not respite to fetch matter out of far Countries. Let us then consider of such as either border upon us, or else are familiar with us at home. All these that follow sucked into their breasts either no faith at all, or the self same faith undoubtedly which we profess, that is, the Catholic faith; namely the Irish men from S. Patrick, the Scots from Palladius, and the English men from S.
Austen, who were all consecrated Bishops at Rome, sent from Rome, and always used great reverence towards Rome.1 The matter is manifest; I run forward: witnesses hereof are all Universities, witnesses all written laws, witnesses are the common manners of all people every where in their own countries, witnesses are the fashions of choosing Emperors, and the solemn ceremonies used in their Coronation, witness are the ancient rites exercised in the anointing of Kings, witnesses are the orders practised in dubbing of Knights, and their very* cloaks. Also witnesses ⟨p. 297⟩[…] the Church windows,3 witnesses are the pieces of money, witnesses are the gates & houses of every City, witnesses are the worthy works and virtuous lives of our au•••st•rs; finally, witnesses are all manner of things both great & small, & all kind of orders, that never any other religion but our catholic religion that ever took any deep root upon the face of the earth. When I saw my self guarded with all these helps, and felt my self comforted with the consideration thereof, I thought it a point of insolent folly, to forsake the great company of all these good Christians, and to join fellowship with the veriest ra••hels that live: therefore I confess that I was greatly animated and urged unto this scholastical combat; wherein, unless the saints be driven out of heaven, and proud Lucifer recover heaven again, I cannot take the fail. Wherefore I trust, M. Chark, who hath conceived so evil opinion of me heretofore, will yet now show me a more favourable countenance, in that I had rather commit in trust this sinful soul of mine, which Christ hath so dearly bought, to a safe and certain way, and unto the Kings high way, then hang it upon the rocks and bushes of Calvins devilish doctrine.
Austen, who were all consecrated Bishops at Rome, sent from Rome, and alwaies vsed great reuerence towards Rome.1
For what man, which is not depriued of iudgement and all sense, will thinke that he fasteth, who (so that he abstainex frō flesh) may at his pleasure glut himselfe with all maner of dainties? Or who can suppose that the Fridayes fast is holier then the Wednesdayes fast, but he must too much sauour of ⟨p. 282⟩Iudaisme? If S. Paul reproued the Galathians,2 because they did obserue dayes, and ymoneths, and times, is it likely he would endure our Papists, which erre more grossely and shamefully? If he forewarned the Colossians, that they would not be intangled with their superstition,4 which thought that some certaine meates were not to bez touched, not to be tasted, not to be handled, would he allow the papisticall choice of meates? If he determined long since,6 that it was diuelish anda hypocriticall to absteine from certaine meates, if he were now liuing, would he change his doctrine, and command this abstinence to a Christian? We truely for our parts do alwayes and very highly commend a true fast, whether it be priuate or publike; neither do we commend them only, but also we vse them, as this yeare last past may most plentifullie witnesse for vs, during which, publike fasts were most religiously obserued in very many places. As for those fasts of Moses, and Dauid, & Helias, and Iohn Baptist, and the Apostles, wherein were they any whit like vnto yours? for if fasting do consist in choyce of meates, and in appointing set dayes, as you resolutely iudge it doth, informe me ⟨p. 283⟩(if you can) that they either at any timeb preferred fish before flesh, or vsed inioyned and yearely set fasts. For Iohn Baptist vsed continually to fast in his manner, and the others fasted as the times and present occasions required, in which their fasts, they absteined as well from fish as from flesh. Therefore in one word to wipe away your imputation of Homonymie, I denie that we vse any. For in that, that we require the spirituall fast, we dislike not the externall,9 howsoeuer this outward fast be nothing profitable without the spirituall. But this deceitfull argumentation, if there were any such here, is rather by inferring a weake consequēt, then by Homonymie, or equiuocation; how beit, what the truth is we haue sufficiently ciscussed.
You haste forward and ioyne vnto these a fourth manner of deceiptfull disputation,1 named Circulation, which is, when one after a few words to no purpose returneth againe to the same, and beggeth the question. I acknowledge it to be a grosse, and vnsauorie kind of sophistry so to do, but shew me an example of our so doing. You propound one example, namely, about the true notes of the Church, for heere, you say, we alwayes make circuits and rounds, and vse that very same thing for an argument, wherein the question lieth. But how prooue you that? forsooth because we say the notes of the Church be, the word of God, and the Sacraments. And so we say truly, for they who haue these, haue a Church of Christ; but they who altogether want these, are vtterly without both the Church and ⟨p. 284⟩Christ. Let vs contend about these notes, that it may be discerned whether you or we haue them. Tell me, in what Court shall we try this title? before what Commissioner, before what Iudge shall we commence our plea? I suppose the word of God must be consulted with. But you say you haue alreadie consulted with it, and you now fauour our cause lesse then you did before. But I say, Campian, we rest vpon the word of God, and not on your iudgement. Yea but (say you) prooue vnto me that this is the word of God: nay it were more meete that you should proue it is not. And I also require of you, that you will do the same thing which you commaund me to do, namely, that you will proue your word and Sacraments to be the very same, which Christ hath commended vnto his Church. Wherefore this is no more our fault, then yours; the controuersie is about the word of God. You contend that you haue it; I contrariwise defend that we haue it: if you like not my iudgement, why may not I dislike yours? But you say, we expound the word camisse: I againe auouch that it is false which you say. Whither are you now come at last? go one foote further forward if you can. Why, say you, I haue the testimonie of fifteene hundred yeeres. This is nought else but a friuolous, a foolish, and an insolent bragge. You haue not, I say, you haue not Campian. You are euer heere deceiued, and turne round againe, as it were into a circle, and are faultie in that same very thing, for which you reprooue ⟨p. 285⟩vs. Touching the Fathers, I haue answered you alreadie. In the questions of greatest waight, they are wholly on ourd side;
THis shall be to you a direct path, so that the simplest that bee, neede not wander out of it. For who is,1 though he be but of the meaner sort of common people, so senselesse (so that he haue an eye vnto his soules health) that cannot see, (if he looke but a little about him) the path of the Church so plainely trodden, that cannot keepe it, if he dislike of by-wayes that lead him through brambles and ragged roches, and places that cannot be passed? These things shall be well knowne euen of those that be ignorant as Esay hath prophecied, and therefore most manifest vnto ⟨p. 287⟩you. If you will,* let vs take a view of all things that are any where to be seene: let vs trauerse ouer euery thing wheresoeuer it be. All things do minister matter fit for our purpose. Let vs ascend into heauen by imagination, there may we finde such as through martyrdome,3 are as ruddie as the reda rose, and also such as for their innocencie while they liued do glister as beautifully as the white Lilly. There may we see (I say) those* three and thirty Bishops ofb Rome, which for their faith were immediatlie murthered one after another. There may we see such Pastors as throughout all nations vpon the earth shed their blood for the testimony of Christs name. There may we see the stock of faithfull people that tread the steps of their Pastors. There may wee see all thec saincts of heauen that through their pure and vertuous conuersation vpon the earth, gaue a rare example vnto all sorts of men. Thou shalt finde that they both liued here, and died members of our Catholick Church. And that we may take a tast of some few by named on our side was Ignatius, that so earnestly thirsted after martyrdome, who in ecclesiasticall matters aduanced a* Bishop euen aboue a King, who penned also certaine traditions of the Apostles, whereof he himselfe was a witnesse, least they should be quite forgotten.e On our side was that Anchorete Telesphorus, who commanded that the fast of Lent which was before instituted by the Apostles shouldbe kept more strictlie. On our side was S. Ireneus, fwho proued that the Apostolike faith descended vnto vs by the succession and sea of Rome. On our side also was that high Bishopg Victor, who by a generall Proclamation* kept the whole Countrie of Asia in due obedience, which Proclamation, though to some it seemed somewhat hard, but specially vnto this most blessed man S.
Ireneus, no man yet attempted to deface as* forraigne authoritie. Polycarpus hwas on our side that about the question of the keeping of Easter day, went and conferred with the sea of Rome, whose reliques after he ⟨p. 288⟩was burned, the faithfull Christians at Smyrna gathered together, and gaue due honor vnto their Bishop, by obseruing yearely the day of his death, as an high and solemne feast. On our side werei S. Cornelius, and S. Cyprian, those golden paire of Martyrs, which were both very worthy Prelates, but the former was the greater, who when he was Bishop of Rome, abolished the Affrican errors. The latter also got great commendations through his loyall obedience which he shewed to his superior, and dearest friend he had in the world. On our side was Sixtus, who when he song Masse at the Altar was solemnely serued with seauen men of the Cleargie. On our side was S. Laurence, this mans Archdeacon, whom the aduersaries cancell out of their Calenders. To whomk Prudentius, a man that had been Consull in Rome about 1200. yeares ago prayed in this wise: O most glorious seruant of Christ, what power is giuen thee, and what authoritie is graunted vnto thee in heauen, the great ioy of the Romanes doe sufficiently shew vpon the obteining of such requests as they make vnto thee. Amongst the which number, I beseech thee mercifullie giue eare to me thy rude Poet that doth confesse vnto thee my sinfull thoughts, & also disclose my wicked actions, heare benignly, I pray thee, me thy humble suppliant Prudentius, that hath highly offended Christ my Sauiour. On our sidel were those most blessed virgins, S. Cecilia, S. Agatha, S. Anastasia, S. Barbara, S. Agnes, S. Lucia, S. Dorethy, and S. Katherine, who constantly kept their vowed chastitie against the tyrannie both of men and diuels. S. Helen was on our side, who was most famous for the finding of the crosse of Christ. S. Monocha the mother of S. Augustine was on our side, who when she lay on her death-bed most deuoutlie desired to be praid for after her death,6 and to haue the* sacrifice of the masse offred for her at Christs altar. S.
Paula was on our side, who forsaking her faire pallace situated within the citie of Rome, and her goodly farmes abroade in the ⟨p. 289⟩Countrie, went on pilgrimage by long iourneys euen vnto to the caue of Bethelem, where Christ lay crying in his cradle, there in solitarinesse to spend the residue of her time. On our side was S. Paulus, S. Hilarion, S. Antony, who liued in solitarinesse till they were old men. On our side was Satyrus, that was brother germain vnto S. Ambrose, who carrying about him in a stole that dreadfull hoast, and being in present danger of shipwrack, hoping assuredlie that he would protect him, lept into the raging sea and s•ome to land. On our side were S. Nicholas and S. Martin, who were both Bishops much exercised in watchings, cloathed altogether in haire-cloth, and fed with fasting. On our side was S. Benet, who was father vnto a great number of Monks. Ten yeares were not long ynough for me to recite this infinite number of Saints, neither do I heere make mention of them, whom before I placed among the Doctors of the Church. I do not forget my promise, that I would passe ouer things as briefly as I could conuenientlie: let him that would know more hereof peruse not only the large histories of auncient writers, but also much more rather the graue authors, which haue almost euery one of them written speciall bookes of the liues of the Saincts, for a remembrance to their posteritie:* then let him tell me what his opinion is of those most auncient Christians,2 and most blessed, of whether religion were they, of the Catholikes religion, or of the Lutherans religion?* I call to witnes the throne of God, and that his tribunall seate, before which I shall stand to render an accompt of these my ten reasons, and of my said act in making my challenge, that either there is no heauen at all, which I and my adherents do detest, or that it belongeth properlie to such only as are of our religion, which thing we for our parts hold for sound doctrine. Now on the contrary side, if you thinke good let vs looke downe into hell,4 where lye some burning in euerlasting fire. Who? the Iewes: what Church are they against? ours. Who else? the heathen: ⟨p. 290⟩What Church haue they most cruellie persecuted? ours, who besides these? the Turks: What Churches haue the pulled downe? ours, who yet? the hereticks: to what Church were they enemies? to ours.*
Forwhat Church I pray you hath alwaies withstood the gates of hell,1 but ours? When after the expulsion of the Iewes vnder Vespatian, and Titus his sonne, Christians increased at Hierusalem, O immortall God what comming of good people was there to the holie places that were there! What wonderfull deuotion was there among all sorts of people to see that Citie of Hierusalem! What zeale to see Christs Sepulcher, what desire to see the manger wherein Christ lay, what thursting after the sight of the crosse whereon Christ was nailed, what longing to behold all sorts of monuments there, in which the holie Church taketh as much delight, as doth a spouse in the garments laid off by her husband! Vpon this began that mortall hatred and implacable of the Iewes against vs; for euen at this day they* complaine, that our Ancestors were the cause of their Ancestors ouerthrow: as for Simon Magus, and the Lutherans,3 they receiued neuer ablow at their hands. Among the heathen there were many tyrants, who during their raigne for the space of 300. yeares, by fits at diuers times, inuented most bitter torments against Christians. Against what manner of Christians I pray you?4 Truly against the Fathers of our faith and their Children. Marke well with your selues the speeches of this tirant, that broiled S. Laurēce on a Gridyron: It now well appeares,5 that this is the order and fashion in your sacrifice. This doctrine you all agree to, that Bishops must offer vp their sacrifice in plate of gold, and the people say, that the sacred blood smoketh out of your cups of siluer, and that ye haue tapers burning on golden candlesticks, during all the time of your night sacrifices. Also as common fame doth testifie, your brethren haue a speciall care to offer vp thousands of pounds, though they sell their lands to get the same, ⟨p. 291⟩the lawfull heire being thus disinherited and brought to beggery, though his holie parents greatly complaineth for such shamefull sale of lands, as should by right discend to him from his grandfathers. This wealth lieth hid in some secret corners of your Churches, and you thinke it a great godlie deed to make your sweet babes goe naked: fetch out these treasures which thou hoordest vp by thy craftie perswasions, and wicked witchcraft, the which I say thou haddest in one darke hole or other:
the commonweale, the Kings Eschecker, and the common treasure haue need thereof. That mony being imployed for souldiers wages, the generall lieutenant may be fully fraughted with souldiers. I vnderstand that this is an vsuall doctrine amongst you. Restore to euery man his owne, behold the Emperour acknowledgeth his owne physnomie stamped vpon his owne coine. Giue to Caesar that which thou knowest to be Caesars. Truly I demaund nothing but that which is iust. Thy God (except I be deceiued) cometh no money, neither brought he with him at his comming into the earth any golden gilderds, but ministred his commandements by word of mouth, being purslesse himselfe. Performe faith fullie that his doctrine which you openly preach abroad, restore your money willingly, content your selfe to be rich in words.* What manner of man seemeth this to be? against whom doth he thus rage? Whose Churches, sacrifices, lights, ceremonies, and ornaments hath he gone about to abolish? What Churches, golden goblets, and chalices of siluer and costlie gifts and rich stuffe enuied he at? This man vndoubtedly doth hold on Luthers part.2 For what other colour haue our mighty* Nimrods pretended to couer their theft withall, when they robbed 1441 0536 V 3 Gods houses, and made hanock of Christs inheritance? On the cōtrary part, what Church was it that Constantine the great, the very terror of Christs enemies, hath brought to quietnes, euen that selfe-same Church, ouer which the high 〈…〉 Bishop Siluester was gouernour,4 whom ⟨p. 292⟩the said Emperour called out of the mount Soract, where he lay secretly for feare of persecution, that by the helpe of the said Siluester he might be* baptised with our Baptisme: vnder what banner fought he, that he became so great a cōqueror? euen vnder the banner of then Crosse: who was his mother, that he attained •o so great honor? euen that blessed woman Saim Helen: what fathers took he part with? with the Fathers for sooth of the Nicene Councell: what manner of men were they? namely they were S. Siuester, S. Iulius, S. Athanasius, S. Nicholas: to whose prayers did he commend himselfe? to the prayers ofo S. Antony: what roome exacted he in the Councell?* the very lowest of all. Oh how much more Princelike was he; when he sate in this seate then they, that since that time ambitionsly haue made sale for a l•ttle, that is far vnfit for a King!
Let vs take a view of heretikes,1 which are the verie dregges and bellowes, and fit food for hell fire. The first that commeth into my mind is Symon Magus: what did he?* he tooke from man freewill, he was still prating of faith only. The next that I remember was Nouatian. What of him? he opposed himselfe to Cornelius the Pope of Rome. He was an enemy to the Sacramets of Perance, and holy Vnction. Thirdly, I thinke of Manes the Persian, who taught that* Baptisme was not a sufficient meane to worke our saluation. After him there started vp Aerius and Arian, who condemned prayers for the only, and was therefore forenamed the* Atheist as well as Lucian was. Then followed Vigilantius, which would not permit men to pray vnto Saints, and Iouinian, who maintained marriage to be as excellent as virginitie: Finally there came after all the whole rable of heretikes, as Macedonius, Pelagius, Nestorius, Eutyches, Monothelites, Image breakers, and others; to which number our posteritie will adde also Luther and Caluin: what of all these? Euery one of them like carion Crowes, hatched al of one kind of egge, rebelled against the chiefe rulers of our Church, and by them were confounded and brought to naught. Let vs now leaue speaking of hell, to returne to the earth againe.5 Whither soeuer I shall cast mine eies, and incline my cogitation, whether I behold the Patriarkes, and Seas Apostolike, or the Bishops of other countries, or renowmed Princes and Emperours, or the first entrance of Christian religion, into euery nation, or any monuments of antiquitie, or the light of reason, or the ⟨p. 294⟩comely sight of honestie.6 I find that all of them doe dutiful seruice, and speake fauourably for our religion: witnes hereof the Romane succession. In whose Church (that I may say as doth S. Augustine)* the principality of the Apostolike chaire, hath euer been in force: witnesses also hereunto, are the seas of the rest of the Apostles, to whom the name Apostolike most excellently agreeth. Because they were first erected by the Apostles themselues, or by those that heard them preach. Witnesses also are the Pastors of euery Church throughout the wide world, who,8 though their abode was in diuers places, yet our religion was common to them also. As S. Ignatius, and S. Chrysostome liued at Antioch: S. Peter, Alexander, Athanasius and Theophilus at Alexandria;
Macarius and Cyril at Hierusalem, Proculus at Constantinople. Gregorie & Basil at Capadocia, Gregorie sirnamed Tha• maturgus in Pontus: Polycarpus at Smyrna: Iustinus at Athens, Dionysius at Corinth. Another Gregorie at Nissa: Methodius at Tyrus, Ephreenus in Syria, Cyprian, Optatus, Augustine in Africke. Epiphanius in Cyprus, Andrew in Creet, Ambrose, Paulinus, Gaudentius, Prosper, Faustus, Vigilius in Italie, I•encus, Martyrus, Hilarius, Eucherius, Gregorie of Toures, and Siluianus in France, Vincentius, Orosins, Heldefonsus, Leander and Isidorus in Spaine: Fugatius, Damanus, Iustus Mellitus and Bede in England. Finallie, lest I should seeme ambitious in reckoning so many names, what treatises or fragments of treatises so euer be extant, of those as in the Primitiue Church preached the Gospell, though in countries farre asunder, yet all of them doe deliuer vnto vs, one and the selfe-same faith* which we Catholikes doe at this present professe; what cause (good Christ) could I alleadge, before thee for my example, but that thou mightest iustly exclude me altogether frō thy blessed company, if I should prefer a number of hedge-creepers, both few in account, and also vnlearned, diuided amongst themselues in opinions, & of a ⟨p. 295⟩••so lo•• befor• s••••y* light ••••pes of the Church? Witnesses also are all Pri•••s,3 Kings, Emperours and all their C••••-weales, the godlinesse of which Princes themselues,4 and also the people vnder their iurisdiction and their good gouernment, both in times of peace and of marres, haue at the first grounded themselues vpon this sound rocke of our Catholik doctrine. What famous men out of the East might I heere recite vnto you that beare the name of Theodosius? what worthy men out of the West, of the name of Charles? what Edwards out of England, what Lewesses out of France, what Hermingildes out of Spaine, what Henries out of Saxony, what Winceslaes out of Bohemia, what Leopaldes out of Austria? What Steuens out of Hungarie, what Iosephats out of Indie? And finally what noble gouernours of many Empires, and Rulers of particular Countries, throughout the whole world, who by their good example, by their force, by their lawes, by their continuall care, by their charges, haue maintained our Church? For so hath Esay prophesied,5 Kings shall be thy foster Fathers, and Queenes shall be thy nurses.
Giue eare, O Queene Elizabeth most mightie Princes, to your Maiestie this great Prophet telleth this tale, he teacheth you precisely, what you haue to doe. And I tell you plaine that one heauen cannot containe* Caluine and these Peeres. Let your Maiestie therefore take part with these honorable Princes, that you may shew your selfe a condigne heire vnto your noble auncesters, answerable vnto your excellent wit, correspōdent to your profound knowledge, worthie of high commendations, and finallie fit for your royall dignitie. Onely this I indeuour as touching your Maiestie, and will indeuour whatsoeuer become of me, against whom, as though I were your deadly enemie, these fellowes do so often threaten hanging on the gallowes: ô welcome sweet crosse to me, ô welcome, I say, ten thousand times sweet crosse of mine! the day will come (most soueraigne Lady and Queene Elizabeth) euen ⟨p. 296⟩that day I say will come, which shall •••dently s•t before your Maiesties eyes whether of the two haue more sincerely loued you, the* societie of Iesuites or Luthers progenie.3 I go forward, there will witnesse with vs all coasts and quarters of the world, wherein the ••angelicall trumpet hath beene sounded euer since Christs natiuity. Was this, thinke you, an easie matter to shut the mouthes of idols, and to translate the kingdome of God vnto the Gentiles. Luther speaketh of Christ, and we Catholicks speake also of Christ. Is Christ then* diuided?5 no surely, but either we preach a wrong Christ, or else he. How then shall we know who preacheth Christ aright? I will tell thee. Let him be true Christ, and on their side by whose bringing in Dagons necks were broken.6 That Christ which is on our side was well content to vse the seruice of men of our Church, when hee expelled out of the harts of so many people, such a number of Iupiters, Mercuries, Dianes, Phebades, and an horrible darke rabble and lamentable hellishnes wherewith many in former time were oppressed. I haue not respit to fetch matter out of farre Countries. Let vs then consider of such as either border vpon vs, or else are familiar with vs at home. All these that follow sucked into their breasts either no faith at all, or the selfe same faith vndoubtedly which we professe, that is, the Catholick faith; namely the Irish men from S. Patrick, the Scots from Palladius, and the English men from S.