A15057:48
An answer to the Ten reasons of Edmund Campian the Jesuit in confidence whereof…An ansvvere to the Ten reasons of Edmund Campian the Iesuit in confidence wherof…
An answer to the Ten reasons of Edmund Campian the Jesuit in confidence whereof he offered disputation to the ministers of the Church of England, in the controversy of faith. Whereunto is added in brief marginal notes, the sum of the defence of those reasons by John Duræus the Scot, being a priest and a Jesuit, with a reply unto it. Written first in the Latin tongue by the reverend and faithful servant of Christ and his Church, William Whitakers, Doctor in Divinity, and the Kings Professor and public reader of Divinity in the University of Cambridge. And now faithfully translated for the benefit of the unlearned (at the appointment and desire of some in authority) into the English tongue; by Richard Stock, preacher in London. ...An ansvvere to the Ten reasons of Edmund Campian the Iesuit in confidence wherof he offered disputation to the ministers of the Church of England, in the controuersie of faith. Whereunto is added in briefe marginall notes, the summe of the defence of those reasons by Iohn Duræus the Scot, being a priest and a Iesuit, with a reply vnto it. Written first in the Latine tongue by the reuerend and faithfull seruant of Christ and his Church, William Whitakers, Doctor in Diuinitie, and the Kings Professor and publike reader of Diuinitie in the Vniuersitie of Cambridge. And now faithfully translated for the benefit of the vnlearned (at the appointment and desire of some in authoritie) into the English tongue; by Richard Stocke, preacher in London. ...
London: printed by Felix Kyngston for Cuthbert Burby and Edmund Weaver, 1606London: printed by Felix Kyngston for Cuthbert Burby and Edmund Weauer, 1606
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The sum of the ninth Answer, touching the sophisms of the Adversary. 1 Jesuits be chief Sophisters and kings of all other in the kingdom of Popery. pag. 263 2 The sophisms of the Papists, by which they would overthrow the marriage of Ministers and Deacons. pag. 264 3 Pope Innocent thought marriage duty to be an unholy thing. ibid. nota 4 Their sophisms, for the Popes supremacy: and his excellency above the Emperor: that he is not to be reproved▪ that he cannot err. pag. 265. 266. 267 5 Though one Pastor have rule over one flock, it followeth not one must have over all. ibid. nota ⟨image 19⟩6 Their sophisms for private Mass: the Priests communicating alone: that the people must have only one part. pag. 267 7 Their sophisms, that prayers must be in an unknown […] us: that the people may not read the Scriptures. pag. 268 8 Their sophisms, that the bread is Christs body, and that it is to be worshipped: that election is for merit. ibid. 9 Their sophisms, that the sick should be anointed: that marriage is a sacrament. That a Monkish life is warrantable by the examples of Elijah and John Baptist; but it is unsound. pag. 269. & nota 10 Their sophisms, that there are seven Sacraments: that images must be set up in Churches. That we are justified by charity, and not by faith. ibid. 11 Their sophisms, that men have free will: that Christ delivered the Fathers out of Limbus: that the authority of the Church is above the Scripture. pag. 270 12 Their sophisms, that all things are not written which are necessary to salvation. That men pass thorough the fire of Purgatory to eternal life. pag. 271 13 The place 2. Thes. 2.15. doth not establish traditions. ibid. nota 14 The 1. Cor. 3.15. doth not prove Purgatory. ibid. nota 15 Some sophisms of Campians. ibid. 16 It is no sophism from the commendation of marriage to overthrow the vow of virginity. pag. 272 17 The Prelates have spoken most basely and impiously of marriage, like to the ancient Heretics. pag. 273 18 They prefer virginity before it, without any Scripture, and yet they make it a Sacrament, and virginity none. pag. 272. nota 19 Marriage is honourable in all, and impure in to degree. pag. 273 20 Protestants use no sophism in disputing against merits. ibid. 21 Papists teach that their merits dipped in Christs blood doth merit salvation: