A15880:116
The account reckoning and confession of the faith of Huldrik Zwinglius bishop of Zuryk…The accompt rekenynge and confession of the faith of Huldrik Zwinglius byshop of Zuryk…
The account reckoning and confession of the faith of Huldrik Zwinglius bishop of Zuryk the chief town of Helvetia sent unto Charles the fifth now Emperor of Rome, holding a counsel with the most noble princes, estates and learned men of Germany assembled together at Augsburg. 1530. in the month of July. Translated out of latin by Thomas Cotsforde. And imprinted at Geneva. In April. 1555.The accompt rekenynge and confession of the faith of Huldrik Zwinglius byshop of Zuryk the chief towne of Heluetia sent vnto Charles the fyfte nowe Emperoure of Rome, holdynge a counsel wyth the moost noble princes, estates and learned men of Germany assembled together at Ausburgh. 1530. in the moneth of Iuly. Translated out of latyn by Thomas Cotsforde. And imprinted at Geneua. In April. 1555.
printed by Egidius Van der Erve, 1555
Article 8: ¶The eight Article.Article 8: ¶The eyght Article.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
And the manhood to be in one place, but the Godhead to be every where doth not divide the person, no more then the son taking to him manhood, divideth the unity of substance. ⟨p. 38⟩But mark this well. It should seem rather to divide the unity of substance (but yet it doth not) while one person taketh to him a creature, which the other two persons take not to them at all: than is, to divide the person, the manhood to be in one place, but the Godhead to by every where. For we may also see in creatures. That the bodies are tied to one place only, but the power and virtue of them strayeth far abroad. As appeareth by two examples following.
And the manhed to be in one place, but the Godhed to be euery where doth not diuide the persone, no more then the sonne takynge to hym manhed, diuideth the vnitie of substance. ⟨p. 38⟩But marke thys well. It shulde seme rather to diuide the vnitie of substāce (but yet it dothe not) whyle one persone taketh to hym a creature, which the other two persones take not to thē at all: than is, to diuide the persone, the manhed to be in one place, but the Godhed to by euery where. For we maye also se in creatures. That the bodyes are tyed to one place only, but the power and vertue of them strayeth farre abrode. As appereth by two examples folowynge.